Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads

Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.015
复制
发表时间:
2008-05-01
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Bella, Francesco
Bella, Francesco
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bella, Francesco

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文报道了对大学间道路安全研究中心(CRISS)交互式固定基础驾驶模拟器的验证研究,目的是验证CRISS驾驶模拟器在双车道农村道路速度研究工具中的有效性。在罗马附近的一条双车道乡村公路上,11个不同路线配置的测量点记录了速度。真实世界是在CRISS驾驶模拟器中重现的。40名司机驾驶着模拟器。比较分析和统计分析的结果确立了相对效度,并揭示了九个测量点的绝对效度。只有在两个非苛刻的配置中,模拟器中的速度显著高于现场记录的速度。在这些地点,模拟器中的平均速度等于或大于94公里/小时。对于这些配置,模拟器中记录的较高速度似乎源于模拟道路上与真实道路上的不同风险感知。这项研究的结果应该被考虑到驾驶速度行为的研究中,其中使用了与CRISS驾驶模拟器相似的模拟设备。(C)2007爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
The paper reports on a validation study of the interactive fixed-base driving simulator of Inter-University Research Center for Road Safety (CRISS) that was effectuated in order to verify the CRISS driving simulator's usefulness at a tool for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Speeds were recorded at eleven measurement sites with different alignment configurations on a two-lane rural road near Rome. The real world was reproduced in the CRISS driving simulator. Forty drivers drove the simulator. The results of the comparative and statistical analysis established the relative validity and also revealed that absolute validity was obtained in nine measurements sites. Only in two non-demanding configurations, were the speeds in simulator significantly higher than those recorded in the field. In these sites the mean speed in simulator was equal to or greater than 94 km/h. For these configurations, the higher speeds recorded in simulator appeared to stem from the different risk perception on the simulated road as opposed to that on the real road. The study's results should be considered for driving speed behavior research, in which simulator equipment with similar features of the CRISS driving simulator is used. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.