Self-control as a personality measure
Self-control as a personality measure
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00055-1
复制
发表时间：
2002-02
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
J. O'Gorman;E. Baxter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. O'Gorman;E. Baxter
该研究基于Gottfredson和Hirschi提出的犯罪一般理论，研究了自我报告自我控制措施的相互关系。R.，& Hirschi，T.（1990年）。犯罪的一般理论。斯坦福大学，CA：斯坦福大学出版社。]，采用五因素人格模型中的责任心量表、Carver和白色的BIS/BAS量表[Carver，D.美国，&白色，T. L.（1994年）。行为抑制，行为激活和情感反应即将到来的奖励和惩罚：BIS/BAS量表。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，67（2），319-333.]以及自我报告轻率行为和犯罪意图的措施。自我控制量表与责任心和BAS量表有一定的重叠，但与BIS量表无显著相关。尽责性预测轻率行为和犯罪意图和自我控制量表和BIS预测犯罪意图。结果表明，自我控制措施和现有的人格量表之间的相似性，以及一些独特的变化，自我控制的预测值。
The study examined the interrelationships of a self-report measure of self-control, based in the General Theory of Crime advanced by Gottfredson and Hirschi [Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.], the Conscientiousness scale from the Five Factor model of personality, the BIS/BAS scales of Carver and White [Carver, D. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333.], and self-report measures of imprudent behaviour and criminal intent. The Self-Control scale showed some overlap with the Conscientiousness and BAS scales, but no significant relationship with the BIS measure. Conscientiousness predicted both imprudent behaviour and criminal intent and the Self-Control scale and BIS predicted criminal intent. The results indicate similarity between the self-control measure and existing personality scales as well as some unique variance in self-control of predictive value.