The Laws of Memory

The Laws of Memory
复制标题

记忆法则

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Campbell
K. Campbell
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Campbell

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭(前南问题国际法庭)积累了大量档案。随着前南问题国际法庭即将关闭,该档案已成为有关其对前南斯拉夫的影响的更广泛辩论的一部分。特别是,这个档案的纪念功能现在变得非常有争议。最终,这些都涉及法律与集体记忆之间的关系。本文以前南问题国际法庭档案为例,探讨冲突后过渡时期法律与记忆的关系。它认为,这种“法律档案”作为一种助记系统,通过其司法、国际和过渡结构产生“法律记忆”。然后,它考虑了法律档案如何记住或忘记法律的正义和战争的非正义的相互竞争的话语。最终,这些论述将档案视为无法产生集体记忆的“法律纪念”。出于这个原因,我提出了“纪念法”的另一种概念,以便提出其他纪念实践,这些实践可以将法律记忆维持为活的记忆,而不是作为死的档案。
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has generated huge archival holdings. With the ICTY’s impending closure, the archive has become part of broader debates regarding its legacy for the former Yugoslavia. In particular, the memorial function of this archive has now become highly contentious. Ultimately, these concern the relationship between law and collective memory. This article uses the example of the ICTY archive to explore the relationship between law and memory in post-conflict transition. It argues that this ‘legal archive’ functions as a mnemonic system that produces ‘legal memory’ through its juridical, international, and transitional structure. It then considers the competing discourses of how the legal archive remembers or forgets the justice of law and the injustice of war. Ultimately, these discourses figure the archive as a ‘legal memorial’ that fails to produce collective memory. For this reason, I develop an alternative concept of ‘memorial law’ in order to suggest other memorial practices that can sustain legal memory as a living memory, rather than as a dead archive.
过渡时期正义
DOI: 10.1628/joer-2021-0003
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Neue Folge
影响因子: --
作者:
Steinl;Leonie
通讯作者: Leonie