Not Forbidding Isn't Allowing: The Cognitive Basis of the Forbid-Allow Asymmetry
Not Forbidding Isn't Allowing: The Cognitive Basis of the Forbid-Allow Asymmetry
复制标题
不禁止就是不允许：禁止与允许不对称的认知基础
DOI：
10.1086/268961
复制
发表时间：
1986
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
N. Schwarz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hans;N. Schwarz
先前的研究表明，受访者更有可能赞同“不允许”（或“不禁止”）的想法，而不是赞同“禁止”（或“允许”）的想法，即使这些表达在逻辑上似乎是等同的。假设是先进的，这种不对称性是由于反应行为的冷漠的受访者既不赞成的东西应该被禁止，也不应该被允许，从而导致更高的认可的负面形式的两个问题的措辞。与此解释相一致的数据和认知机制的反应行为的冷漠进行了讨论。
Previous research demonstrated that respondents are more likely to endorse the idea that something should “not be allowed” (or “not be forbidden”) than to endorse the idea that it should be “forbidden” (or “allowed”), even though these expressions seem logically equivalent. The hypothesis is advanced that this asymmetry is due to the response behavior of indifferent respondents who neither endorse that something should be forbidden nor that it should be allowed, resulting in higher endorsements of the negative form of both question wordings. Data consistent with that explanation are presented and the cognitive mechanism underlying the response behavior of indifferents is discussed.