COLLECTIVE RESTRAINT IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS - PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION EFFECTS ON SUPPORT FOR AUTHORITIES
COLLECTIVE RESTRAINT IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS - PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION EFFECTS ON SUPPORT FOR AUTHORITIES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482
复制
发表时间：
1995-09-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
DEGOEY, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
TYLER, TR;DEGOEY, P
本研究考察了人们在自然发生的社会困境中--1991年加州水资源短缺--的自我约束意愿。研究结果表明，人们更愿意支持当局谁作出节约用水的决定时，这些当局使用公平的决策程序。程序正义的效果没有被发现的影响，感知的严重性的资源稀缺性或当局的决定的可执行性。相反，他们主要是出于对与当局建立积极的关系纽带的关切。这些关系的影响被认为是更强的受访者谁认同他们的社区。研究表明，当局的效力主要与其与社区成员的社会联系的性质有关。
This study examined people's willingness to restrain themselves during a naturally occurring social dilemma situation-the 1991 California water shortage. The findings suggest that people are more willing to support authorities who make water conservation decisions when these authorities use fair decision-making procedures. Procedural justice effects were not found to be influenced by the perceived severity of the resource scarcity or the favorability of the authorities' decisions. Rather, they were primarily based on concerns for having positive, relational bonds to the authorities. These relational effects were found to be stronger for those respondents who identify more with their community. The study suggests that the effectiveness of authorities is primarily linked to the nature of their social bonds with community members.