HLA CLASS-II (DR AND DQ) ANTIGEN ASSOCIATIONS IN IDIOPATHIC DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY - VALIDATION-STUDY AND METAANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED HLA ASSOCIATION STUDIES

HLA CLASS-II (DR AND DQ) ANTIGEN ASSOCIATIONS IN IDIOPATHIC DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY - VALIDATION-STUDY AND METAANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED HLA ASSOCIATION STUDIES
复制标题

DOI:
10.1161/01.cir.83.2.515
复制
发表时间:
1991-02-01
期刊:
影响因子:
37.8
通讯作者:
ANDERSON, JL
ANDERSON, JL
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
CARLQUIST, JF;MENLOVE, RL;ANDERSON, JL

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们先前在一项初步研究中报道了特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)患者和健康对照者之间HLA-DR 4和HLA-DRw 6抗原频率的差异。为了证实这些发现,我们进行了一项独立的研究,一个前瞻性的假设,关于DR 4和DRw 6的频率;分型的第二个家庭的第二类抗原(HLA-DQ),因为接近的DQ位点的DR位点和一些DR和DQ等位基因之间的强连锁不平衡。比较IDC患者(n = 41)和健康血库对照(n = 53)的新的连续系列,我们证实患者中DR 4抗原频率增加(49%对21%,p < 0.005)。还注意到患者中DRw 6表达降低的趋势(10%的患者对23%的对照)。与对照组相比,HLA-DQw 4在患者中显著升高(27%对6%,p < 0.005;相对危险度,6.1;病因分数,0.22)。我们在41名高加索IDC患者中的5名(12%)和53名对照中的0名(p < 0.007)中鉴定了组合的DR 4-DQw 4单倍型。初步研究和验证研究之间特异性抗原频率的比较未显示显著差异;因此,对两项研究的数据进行了合并检查。在联合研究中,DR 4升高(51% vs 27%,对照组,p < 0.001),DRw 6降低(9% vs 24%,对照组,p < 0.01)。DR 4的相对危险度为2.8,病因分数为0.33。在这项研究中,DR 4-DQw 4单倍型具有不确定的高疾病风险;在41例ID C病例中有26例(63%)发现DR 4、DQw 4或两种抗原的存在,而在53例对照中有14例(26%)(p < 0.001)。对探索性和验证性研究以及所有报告的比较IDC患者和对照组中HLA-DR抗原频率的研究进行荟萃分析。该综述表明,对于所有五项研究,IDC病例中HLA-DR 4的频率显著增加(总体比值比,2.06; 98%置信区间,1.61-2.65; p < 0.0001)。总之,我们已经证实了HLA-DR 4参与IDC,并提出了与DQw 4的额外关联。报告研究的荟萃分析证实,DR 4相关性可在几个不同的患者人群中重复。因此,在一部分IDC病例中,似乎存在与免疫调节基因座相关的易感遗传因素。
We previously reported antigen frequency differences for HLA-DR4 and HLA-DRw6 between idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) patients and healthy controls in a pilot study. To confirm these findings, we undertook an independent study with a prospective hypothesis regarding the frequencies of DR4 and DRw6; typing for a second family of class II antigens (HLA-DQ) was included because of the proximity of the DQ loci to the DR loci and the strong linkage disequilibrium between some of the DR and DQ alleles. Comparing a new consecutive series of IDC patients (n = 41) and healthy blood bank controls (n = 53), we confirmed an increase of DR4 antigen frequency in patients (49% versus 21%, p < 0.005). A trend toward decreased expression of DRw6 among patients was also noted (10% of patients versus 23% of controls). HLA-DQw4 was significantly elevated in patients compared with controls (27% versus 6%, p < 0.005; relative risk, 6.1; etiologic fraction, 0.22). We identified the combined DR4-DQw4 haplotype in five of 41 Caucasian IDC patients (12%) and none of 53 controls (p < 0.007). A comparison of specific antigen frequencies between the preliminary and validation studies did not reveal significant differences; therefore, the data from the two studies were examined in combination. For the combined studies, DR4 was elevated (51% versus 27% in controls, p < 0.001), and DRw6 was decreased (9% versus 24% in controls, p < 0.01). The relative risk for DR4 was 2.8, and the etiologic fraction was 0.33. In this study, the DR4-DQw4 haplotype bears an indeterminately high risk for disease; the presence of DR4, DQw4, or both antigens was found in 26 of 41 ID C cases (63%) compared with 14 of 53 controls (26%) (p < 0.001). Meta-analysis of the exploratory and validation studies in combination with all reported studies comparing the frequency of HLA-DR antigens in IDC patients and controls was performed. This overview indicated that for all five studies, there is a significant increase in the frequency of HLA-DR4 in cases of IDC (overall odds ratio, 2.06; 98% confidence interval, 1.61-2.65; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we have verified HLA-DR4 involvement in IDC and suggested an additional association with DQw4. The meta-analysis of reported studies confirms that the DR4 association can be replicated in several different patient populations. Thus, in a portion of IDC cases, predisposing genetic factors linked to immunoregulatory loci appear to be present.