Stratification economics and identity economics
Stratification economics and identity economics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/cje/beu071
复制
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Davis, John B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Davis, John B.
分层经济学代表了一种重要的新方法，致力于解释社会群体如何根据相对群体地位被分离或分层的经济不平等。本文将分层经济学与身份经济学相结合，探讨交叉性现象（人们具有多重社会群体身份）给分层经济学带来的复杂性。它区分了社会心理学家认可的两种类型的社会身份，分类社会身份和关系社会身份，并使用这种区分来解释个人的个人身份，被理解为社会身份的有序集合，可以被视为社会和自我建构。个体根据他们在互动社会环境中赋予的权重对他们的分类社会身份进行排序和排名，在互动社会环境中，他们基于角色的关系社会身份联合收割机结合了不同的分类社会身份。研究在社会心理学的耻辱身份威胁的文献，然后进行审查，以区分两个对立的方式，个人回应他人的污名化，他们的社会群体在互动设置。本文认为，个人对污名的反应方式反映了社会群体的权力关系和个人主义社会本体论的稀缺逻辑，并倾向于加强社会分层。
Stratification economics represents an important new approach devoted to explaining economic inequality in terms of how social groups are separated or stratified according to relative group status. This paper combines stratification economics with identity economics to address complications that the phenomenon of intersectionality-people having multiple social group identities-creates for stratification economics. It distinguishes two types of social identities recognised by social psychologists, categorical and relational social identities, and uses this distinction to explain how individuals' personal identities, understood as ordered sets of social identities, can be seen to be both socially and self-constructed. Individuals order and rank their categorical social identities according to weights they assign to them in interactive social settings in which their role-based relational social identities combine different categorical social identities. Research in social psychology in the stigma identity-threat literature is then reviewed to distinguish two opposed ways in which individuals respond to others' stigmatisation of their social groups in interactive settings. The paper argues that the ways in which individuals respond to stigma reflect social group power relationships and the scarcity logic of individualist social ontologies and tend to reinforce social stratification.