On the relative performance of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast CT and conventional, attenuation-based CT.
On the relative performance of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast CT and conventional, attenuation-based CT.
复制标题
边缘照明 X 射线相衬 CT 与传统衰减 CT 的相对性能。
DOI:
10.1002/mp.12179
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Hagen CK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hagen CK
PurposeThis article is aimed at comparing edge illumination (EI) x‐ray phase contrast computed tomography (PCT) and conventional (attenuation‐based) computed tomography (CT), based on their respective contrast and noise transfer.MethodsThe noise in raw projections obtained with EI PCT is propagated through every step of the data processing, including phase retrieval and tomographic reconstruction, leading to a description of the noise in the reconstructed phase tomograms. This is compared to the noise in corresponding attenuation tomograms obtained with CT. Specifically, a formula is derived that allows evaluating the relative performance of both modalities on the basis of their contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), for a variety of experimental parameters.ResultsThe noise power spectra of phase tomograms are shifted towards lower spatial frequencies, leading to a fundamentally different noise texture. The relative performance of EI PCT and CT, in terms of their CNR, is linked to spatial resolution: the CNR in phase tomograms is generally superior to that in attenuation tomograms for higher spatial resolutions (tens to hundreds ofμm), but inferior for lower spatial resolutions (hundreds ofμm to mm).ConclusionThese results imply that EI PCT could outperform CT in applications for which high spatial resolutions are key, e.g., small animal or specimen imaging.