A comparison of the validity of generic- and disease-specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life
A comparison of the validity of generic- and disease-specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02031.x
复制
发表时间：
1999-10-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Locker, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allen, PF;McMillan, AS;Locker, D
近年来，已经开发了许多工具来测量口腔疾病的结果。口腔健康影响概况（OHIP）是迄今为止开发的最复杂和最全面的措施。目前，关于使用这一措施的报告仅限于描述性人口研究。目的：本研究的目的是比较的有效性OHIP与一般健康相关的生活质量的措施，SF 36。研究方法：研究对象分为三组，即，无牙患者寻求牙科种植体（“种植体受试者”，n=32），无牙患者寻求传统的假牙（“无牙对照”，n=35）和有牙患者（“有牙对照”，n=21）。所有受试者在接受任何治疗前均完成了OHIP和SF 36。无牙受试者还完成了对现有传统义齿满意度的主观评估。OHIP数据使用简单计数和加权评分方法计算。结果如下：每组报告的负面影响的中位数为：17例（植入体受试者）、6例（传统对照）和1例（齿状对照）。OHIP分量表得分显著高于对照组（P
In recent years, a number of instruments have been developed to measure the outcomes of oral disease. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is the most sophisticated and comprehensive measure developed to date. At present, reports of the use of this measure are confined to descriptive population studies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the validity of the OHIP with a generic health-related quality of life measure, the SF36. Methods: Study subjects were in three groups, namely, edentulous patients seeking dental implants ("implant subjects", n=32), edentulous patients seeking conventional dentures ("edentulous control", n=35) and dentate patients ("dentate control", n=21). All subjects completed an OHIP and SF36 prior to receiving any treatment. The edentulous subjects also completed a subjective assessment of satisfaction with their existing conventional dentures. OHIP data were computed using the simple count and weighted scores methods. Results: The median number of negative impacts reported for each group was: 17 (implant subjects), six (conventional control) and one (dentate control). OHIP sub-scale scores were significantly higher (P