Community response to IRONEX
Community response to IRONEX
复制标题
社区对 IRONEX 的回应
作者:
K. Banse
SIR-The iron fertilization experiment in the sea near the Galapagos Islands in mid-October 1993 (IRONEX) 1 showed that the cell division rate of unenclosed phytoplankton, initially high, was quickly enhanced by Fe addition, as had been found in bottle experiments in other high nutrient (nitrate)-low chlorophyll regions. However, the increase of phytoplankton concentration during the days after the IRONEX experiment was not merely an issue of cell physiology2, but was a system response resulting in a new balance between cell division rate and losses from grazing and physical factors. I suggest that even for the first 3 days after fertilization (days 299-301) the grazers continued to keep this offshore phytoplankton in check despite the increase in the rates of photosynthesis and cell division. In addition, the remineralization of carbon by the food web during this time helps to explain the small effect of the iron enrichment on the CO2 system3. The grazing loss, not measured during IRONEX, is calculated here for the upper-20 m during the first 3 days after fertilization, using estimates of photosynthesis (from 14C uptake over 24 h starting within 1 h of local noon; Fig. 3 of ref. 1) and change of phytoplankton biomass (from microscopy: C values kindly supplied by K. Buck, KJ Coale and SJ Tanner). The near-constant concentrations of the inert tracer SF6'added to the Fe-enriched water (column 6 of table; values kindly provided by AJ Watson), show that losses of phytoplankton from physical dilution were negligible. Also, sinking of the dominant small cells1 can be discounted.