Comparison of noncontact infrared thermometry and 3 commercial subcutaneous temperature transponding microchips with rectal thermometry in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
Comparison of noncontact infrared thermometry and 3 commercial subcutaneous temperature transponding microchips with rectal thermometry in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
复制标题
非接触式红外测温法与 3 种商用皮下温度转发微芯片与恒河猴（Macaca mulatta）直肠测温法的比较。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Marla K Brunell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Marla K Brunell
本研究对50只恒河猴（Macacamulatta）进行了非接触式红外激光测温仪和3种不同品牌的皮下温度传感芯片与直肠测温的比较。使用组内相关系数和一致性限对数据进行分析。此外，温度计在临床环境中的技术能力和实用性进行了审查。研究的替代技术均不等同于恒河猴的直肠测温。与非接触式红外测温法相比，微芯片测温法测得的体温与直肠温度的相关性更高，且与直肠温度的相关性更强。然而，转发微芯片并没有产生一致的结果。由于难以将未镇静的猕猴定位在其家中，皮下微芯片在临床环境中不实用。此外，成对圈养的猕猴可能能够从它们的笼中破坏或移除微芯片。
This study compared a noncontact infrared laser thermometer and 3 different brands of subcutaneous temperature transponding microchips with rectal thermometry in 50 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). The data were analyzed by using intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement. In addition, the technical capabilities and practicality of the thermometers in the clinical setting were reviewed. None of the alternative techniques investigated was equivalent to rectal thermometry in rhesus macaques. Temperatures obtained by using microchips had higher correlation and agreed more closely with rectal temperatures than did those obtained by the noncontact infrared method. However, transponding microchips did not yield consistent results. Due to difficulty in positioning nonsedated macaques in their homecage, subcutaneous microchips were not practical in the clinical setting. Furthermore, pair-housed macaques may be able to break or remove microchips from their cagemates.