Verbal abuse against home care aides: another shot across the bow in violence against health care and other workers.
Verbal abuse against home care aides: another shot across the bow in violence against health care and other workers.
复制标题
针对家庭护理人员的辱骂:针对医疗保健人员和其他工作人员的暴力行为的又一枪击事件。
DOI:
10.1136/oemed-2019-105925
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Gerberich,SusanGoodwin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gerberich,SusanGoodwin
It is disconcerting that while physical assault is perceived as a major consequence of work-related violence, non-physical violence—which includes threats, sexual harassment, verbal abuse and bullying—may result in even greater burdens for the victims. 1–4 In particular, verbal abuse involving another person yelling or swearing, engaging in name calling or using other words intended to control or hurt has consistently been reported as the most common form of workplace violence. 1 2 4 5 This is particularly the case in the Health Care and Social Assistance sector which is at highest risk of non-fatal violence in the USA and a major problem globally. 3 4The problem of verbal abuse is especially highlighted by Karlsson et al 6 from their occupational study of home care aides 7 who constitute an important proportion of healthcare workers. 8 Based on questionnaire survey data collected from 954 Health Care Aides who reported on verbal abuse from non-family clients and their family members, increased risks identified for verbal abuse involved caring for patients with limited mobility and working in homes with limited space in which to perform care tasks; a decreased risk was identified when predictable work schedules were maintained by the caregiver. Aides who reported verbal abuse within the last 12 months, compared with those who did not, were 11 times more likely to also report physical abuse. Importantly, this was consistent with previous documentation of verbal abuse as a risk factor for physical assault by Lanza et al. 9 In the current study, 22% reported at least one incident of verbal abuse within the last 12 months; other occupational studies have reported a range between 26% and 65% and beyond.