Academic Literacies: The Public and Private Discourse of University Students
Academic Literacies: The Public and Private Discourse of University Students
复制标题
学术素养：大学生的公共和私人话语
DOI：
10.2307/357570
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Elizabeth Chiseri
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Elizabeth Chiseri
“学术素养”表明，狭隘地关注阅读、写作和思考的学术方式对大学一级的学生和教师来说都是有限的。Chiseri-Strater使用民族志领域的方法来揭示两个大学生给不同学科带来的多重素养，并展示了性别，人类发展和个人才能等因素如何在大学课程中被忽视。她反对赫希对“文化素养”的狭隘看法，并提出了许多建议，以扩大我们对学术环境中“文化素养”的概念。这本书加入了关于文化素养的持续辩论，但与赫希和布鲁姆的作品不同，它提供了一个新的观点-学生的观点。那些为高等教育规划课程和设定目标的人往往忽视了这些作为系统赞助人的个人。此外，参与学术话语共同体这一新兴领域的写作学者也会对奇塞里-斯特拉特的立场感兴趣。最后，由于这本书对大学中占主导地位的“掌握”教学模式提出了批评，它应该吸引那些正在发展女权主义教育学的妇女研究学者，这种教育学使女学生参与关于妇女的认识、感知和学习方式的对话。
"Academic Literacies" suggests that the narrow focus on academic ways of reading, writing and thinking is limited and limiting for both students and teachers at the college level. Chiseri-Strater uses ethnographic field methods to uncover the multiple literacies that two college students bring to different disciplines and shows how factors such as gender, human development, and private talents are ignored in the college curriculum. She works against Hirsch's restricted view of "cultural literacy" and offers many suggestions for expanding our notion of what it means to be "literate" in an academic setting. This book joins the continuing debate over cultural literacy, but unlike Hirsch's and Bloom's works, it offers a new point of view - the students'. Those who plan curricula and set goals for higher education too often ignore these individuals who are the patrons of the system. In addition, composition scholars who are involved in the emerging field of academic discourse communities will find Chiseri-Strater's position of interest. Finally, since the book offers a critique of the dominant "mastery" mode of teaching in colleges, it should appeal to those woman's studies scholars who are developing a feminist pedagogy that brings women students into the conversation about womens's ways of knowing, perceiving and learning.