Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers
Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0893-164x.15.4.373
复制
发表时间：
2001-12-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Coffey, TT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Murphy, JG;Duchnick, JJ;Coffey, TT
作者评估了大学生简短酒精筛查和干预的效果（基础；L. a . Dimeff， J. S. Baer， D. R. Kivlahan, & G. a . Marlatt, 1999），这是一次旨在减少酗酒和相关危害的饮酒相关反馈。大学生饮酒者（N = 99）被分配到BASICS、教育干预组或仅评估对照组。在干预后3个月，总体上没有显著的组间差异，但重度饮酒的BASICS参与者比重度饮酒控制组和受教育组的参与者每周饮酒和酗酒的减少幅度更大。在9个月时，重度饮酒的参与者再次显示出最大的效应值。BASICS参与者对干预的评价高于教育参与者。这项研究表明，对于酗酒的大学生来说，BASICS可能比教育干预更有效。
The authors evaluated the efficacy of Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS; L. A. Dimeff, J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, & G. A. Marlatt, 1999), a single session of drinking-related feedback intended to reduce heavy drinking and related harm. College student drinkers (N = 99) were assigned to BASICS, an educational intervention, or an assessment-only control group. At 3 months postintervention, there were no overall significant group differences, but heavier drinking BASICS participants showed greater reductions in weekly alcohol consumption and binge drinking than did heavier drinking control and education participants. At 9 months, heavier drinking BASICS participants again showed the largest effect sizes. BASICS participants evaluated the intervention more favorably than did education participants. This study suggests that BASICS may be more efficacious than educational interventions for heavier drinking college students.