Using Dialogue Features to Predict Trouble During Collaborative Learning
Using Dialogue Features to Predict Trouble During Collaborative Learning
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11257-006-9001-x
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Bradley A. Goodman;Frank Linton;Robert Gaimari;J. Hitzeman;Helen Ross;Guido Zarrella
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bradley A. Goodman;Frank Linton;Robert Gaimari;J. Hitzeman;Helen Ross;Guido Zarrella
出版商介绍的错误发生在上述文章中，该文章发表在《用户建模和用户适应交互15(1-2)：85-134》(DOI 10.1007/s112570045269-x)中。在第97页上，图6应该如下所示。第124页第5.2节的第二段至最后一段应改为以下一段。最后，第133页和第134页弗兰克·林顿和珍妮特·希茨曼的履历如下所示。我们的实施中出现了一个一般性问题。当一个问题浮出水面对皮尔斯有帮助时，皮尔斯经常打断过去太久。人们可以通过降低基本规则的激活阈值来解决这一困难。如上所述，将阈值设置得太低可能会导致过多的中断，这同样是不受欢迎的结果。而皮尔斯规则的微调
Errors introduced by the publisher occurred in the above-mentioned article which was published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15 (1–2): 85–134 (DOI 10.1007/s11257-004-5269-x). On page 97, Figure 6 should appear as shown below. The second to the last paragraph of Section 5.2 on page 124 should be changed to the one below. Lastly, the vitae for Frank Linton and Janet Hitzeman on pages 133 and 134 should be as listed below.One general issue arose with our implementation. Pierce often interrupted too far past when a problem surfaced to be helpful. One could address this difficulty by lowering the activation threshold for the underlying rule. Setting the threshold too low, as shown above, can result in too many interruptions, an equally undesired outcome. While fine-tuning of Pierce’s rules