A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.
A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1757-1146-6-5
复制
发表时间：
2013-02-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Stuck RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Budiman-Mak E;Conrad KJ;Mazza J;Stuck RM
足部功能指数(FFI)是一种自我报告的足部专用仪器，测量疼痛和残疾，20多年来一直被广泛用于测量足部健康。针对对FFI的批评，制定了修订后的FFI(FFI-R)。本综述的目的是评估内科和外科文献中所报道的FFI和FFI-R的用途，并解决文献中发现的改善FFI-R指标的建议。从1991年10月至2010年12月对PubMed/Medline和Embase数据库进行系统的文献搜索是主要的文献来源。为了丰富书目，搜索扩展到BioMedLib和Scope搜索引擎和手动搜索方法。搜索词包括FFI、FFI分数、FFI-R。要求包括摘要/全文文章、英文出版物和包含“足部投诉/问题”一词的文章。选定的文章经过仔细审查；循证医学从文献中提取数据，并收集到为本综述设计的表格中。循证医学分析表格，KJC、JM、RMS审核并确认表格内容。KJC和JM重新分析了FFI-R的原始数据库，以改进指标。对符合本综述条件的78篇论文，将摘要汇编成12个表。FFI和FFI-R被用于对全球4700人的足部和脚踝疾病的研究。在各种研究中使用FFI全量表或分量表和FFI-R作为结果测量；在FFI分量表的基础上开发了新的工具。FFI Full Scale被改编/翻译成其他文化。本文对FFI和FFI-R的心理测量学特性进行了综述。对FFI-R分量表的重新分析确认为单维度，并将FFI-R问卷的回答类别编辑为四个回答，以便于使用。这篇综述仅限于近二十年来用英文发表的文章。FFI在全球广泛使用；该仪器开创了足部健康的可量化测量方法，从而将结果测量的范式转移到以患者为中心的主观、有效、可靠和反应灵敏的硬数据端点。将FFI-R编辑为四个响应类别将增强其测量足部健康的用户友好性。
The Foot Function Index (FFI) is a self-report, foot-specific instrument measuring pain and disability and has been widely used to measure foot health for over twenty years. A revised FFI (FFI-R) was developed in response to criticism of the FFI. The purpose of this review was to assess the uses of FFI and FFI-R as were reported in medical and surgical literature and address the suggestions found in the literature to improve the metrics of FFI-R. A systematic literature search of PubMed/Medline and Embase databases from October 1991 through December 2010 comprised the main sources of literature. To enrich the bibliography, the search was extended to BioMedLib and Scopus search engines and manual search methods. Search terms included FFI, FFI scores, FFI-R. Requirements included abstracts/full length articles, English-language publications, and articles containing the term "foot complaints/problems." Articles selected were scrutinized; EBM abstracted data from literature and collected into tables designed for this review. EBM analyzed tables, KJC, JM, RMS reviewed and confirmed table contents. KJC and JM reanalyzed the original database of FFI-R to improve metrics. Seventy-eight articles qualified for this review, abstracts were compiled into 12 tables. FFI and FFI-R were used in studies of foot and ankle disorders in 4700 people worldwide. FFI Full scale or the Subscales and FFI-R were used as outcome measures in various studies; new instruments were developed based on FFI subscales. FFI Full scale was adapted/translated into other cultures. FFI and FFI-R psychometric properties are reported in this review. Reanalysis of FFI-R subscales' confirmed unidimensionality, and the FFI-R questionnaires' response categories were edited into four responses for ease of use. This review was limited to articles published in English in the past twenty years. FFI is used extensively worldwide; this instrument pioneered a quantifiable measure of foot health, and thus has shifted the paradigm of outcome measure to subjective, patient-centered, valid, reliable and responsive hard data endpoints. Edited FFI-R into four response categories will enhance its user friendliness for measuring foot health.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Domsic, RT;Saltzman, CL
通讯作者：
Saltzman, CL
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Aurich, Matthias;Bedi, Harvinder S.;Blackney, Mark
通讯作者：
Blackney, Mark
DOI：
10.1097/ta.0b013e3181a74667
发表时间：
2010-01-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Eberl, Robert;Singer, Georg;Hoellwarth, Michael E.
通讯作者：
Hoellwarth, Michael E.
DOI：
10.7547/87507315-88-9-419
发表时间：
1998-09-01
影响因子：
0.7
作者：
Bennett, PJ;Patterson, C;Baglioni, T
通讯作者：
Baglioni, T
DOI：
10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.002
发表时间：
2009-04-01
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Baldassin, Valeria;Gomes, Cicero R.;Beraldo, Paulo S.
通讯作者：
Beraldo, Paulo S.