Theory of the splay nematic phase: Single versus double splay.

Theory of the splay nematic phase: Single versus double splay.
复制标题

展开向列相理论:单展开与双展开。

DOI:
10.1103/physreve.101.052707
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Physical review. E
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jonathan V Selinger
Jonathan V Selinger
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Rosseto;Jonathan V Selinger

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近的实验报道了一种新的展曲相位,其具有正展曲和负展曲的交替域。为了模拟这个阶段,以前的研究已经考虑了一个一维(1D)张开调制的导演场,伴随着一个1D调制的极性顺序。当展曲和极序之间的挠曲电耦合变得足够强时,均匀的电致伸缩状态变得不稳定以形成调制相位。在这里,我们重新审视这一理论在最近的液晶弹性,这表明,纯展曲变形是双展曲,而不是平面单展曲的方法。根据这一推理,我们提出了一种结构与二维(2D)的展弦调制的导演场,伴随着2D调制的极序,并表明,2D结构一般具有较低的自由能比1D结构。
Recent experiments have reported a novel splay nematic phase, which has alternating domains of positive and negative splay. To model this phase, previous studies have considered a one-dimensional (1D) splay modulation of the director field, accompanied by a 1D modulation of polar order. When the flexoelectric coupling between splay and polar order becomes sufficiently strong, the uniform nematic state becomes unstable to the formation of a modulated phase. Here we reexamine this theory in terms of a recent approach to liquid crystal elasticity, which shows that pure splay deformation is double splay rather than planar single splay. Following that reasoning, we propose a structure with a two-dimensional (2D) splay modulation of the director field, accompanied by a 2D modulation of polar order, and show that the 2D structure generally has a lower free energy than the 1D structure.
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.90.045004
发表时间: 2018-11-20
影响因子: 44.1
作者:
Jakli, Antal;Lavrentovich, Oleg D.;Selinger, Jonathan V.
通讯作者: Selinger, Jonathan V.