Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
复制标题
医学文献用户指南：XXIII。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Deborah J. Cook
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Giacomini;Deborah J. Cook
这两部分系列的第二部分是关于如何解释定性研究的地址，“结果是什么”，以及“它们如何帮助我照顾我的病人？”定性分析是一个总结和解释数据的过程，以发展理论见解，描述和解释社会现象，如互动，经验，角色，观点，符号和组织。关键的结果往往是说明与摘录采访成绩单，现场笔记，或文件。定性研究报告的结果最好被理解为对正在进行的对话和探索的基于经验的贡献。基于经验的理论是从探索、发现、分析和综合的过程中发展而来的。每个概念都应该以一种对读者有意义的方式仔细定义。在得出理论结论时，应充分阐述和说明概念。论点应该得到解释和证明。理想情况下，定性研究报告应该说明研究结果与该领域其他理论的关系。定性研究可以为理解和导航类似的社会环境互动或关系提供有用的路线图。美国医学会杂志2000;284：478-482
The second part of this 2-part series on how to interpret qualitative research addresses, "what are the results," and, "how do they help me care for my patients?" Qualitative analysis is a process of summarizing and interpreting data to develop theoretical insights that describe and explain social phenomena such as interactions, experiences, roles, perspectives, symbols, and organizations. Key results are often illustrated with excerpts from interview transcripts, field notes, or documents. The results of a qualitative research report are best understood as an empirically based contribution to ongoing dialogue and exploration. Empirically based theory evolves from a process of exploration, discovery, analysis, and synthesis. Each concept should be defined carefully in a way that is meaningful to the reader. Concepts should be adequately developed and illustrated when theoretical conclusions are drawn. Arguments should be explained and justified. The qualitative research report ideally should address how the findings relate to other theories in the field. The qualitative study can provide a useful road map for understanding and navigating similar social settings interactions, or relationships. JAMA. 2000;284:478-482
替代判断：替代预测的准确性如何？
影响因子：
39.2
作者：
Seckler,AB;Meier,DE;Mulvihill,M;Paris,BE
通讯作者：
Paris,BE
医生和配偶对老年患者复苏偏好的预测。
DOI：
10.1093/geronj/43.5.m115
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
Journal of gerontology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Uhlmann,RF;Pearlman,RA;Cain,KC
通讯作者：
Cain,KC