Two cases of CLIPPERS with increased number of perivascular CD20-positive B lymphocytes

Two cases of CLIPPERS with increased number of perivascular CD20-positive B lymphocytes
复制标题

CLIPPERS血管周围CD20阳性B淋巴细胞增多2例

DOI:
10.1093/brain/awy234
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
14.5
通讯作者:
Xu Hong Wei
Xu Hong Wei
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yi Fang;Tian Yun;Chen Xiao Yu;Zhou Yafang;Hu Ya Cen;Sun Qiying;Guo Ji Feng;Tang Beisha;Zhou Lin;Li Jing;Xu Hong Wei

文献摘要

相似文献

先生,我们对最近发表在《脑》杂志上的文章感兴趣,该文章提出了Tobin及其同事(2017)对类固醇反应性脑桥血管周围增强的慢性淋巴细胞性炎症(CLIPPERS)的新临床、MRI和神经病理学诊断标准。在这里,我们报告了最近的两个病例,满足临床和MRI标准的CLIPPERS,但未能满足新的神经病理学标准,提出了血管周围CD 20阳性B淋巴细胞数量增加。由于CLIPPERS没有特定的神经病理学生物标志物,也没有其他更好的解释这两个病例的神经病理学表现,我们建议我们不应该仅仅因为他们不符合作者概述的神经病理学标准而排除非CLIPPERS,并且需要扩大频谱。
Sir, We were interested in the recent article published in Brain proposing the new clinical, MRI and neuropathology diagnostic criteria of chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS) by Tobin and colleagues (2017). Here, we report two recent cases fulfilling the clinical and MRI criteria of CLIPPERS, but which failed to meet the new neuropathological criteria by presenting increased number of perivascular CD20-positive B lymphocytes. As there were no specific neuropathological biomarkers for CLIPPERS, and no other better explanation for neuropathological presentation of these two cases, we suggest that we should not exclude non-CLIPPERS simply because they did not meet the neuropathological criteria outlined by the authors, and the spectrum needs to be broadened.