Drug detailing in academic medical centers: regulating for the right reasons, with the right evidence, at the right time.
Drug detailing in academic medical centers: regulating for the right reasons, with the right evidence, at the right time.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15265160903441103
复制
发表时间：
2010-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Schillinger D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Steinman MA;Schillinger D
托马斯·赫德尔（2010）在他的文章《从行为经济学中推导伦理学的陷阱：为什么美国医学院协会对药物细节的看法是错误的》中概括了反对在学术医疗中心禁止药物细节的几个论点。简而言之，Huddle认为，关于细节效果的经验数据并不是决定性的，限制与销售代表的互动并没有上升到“不合格的道德要求”的水平。因此，Huddle认为，职业道德并不要求反对详细说明，政策回应应该：斯坦曼博士得到了国家老龄化研究所和美国老龄化研究联合会（K23 AG 030999）的职业发展奖的支持。Schillinger博士得到了NIH资助UL 1 RR 024131的支持。披露：斯坦曼博士担任原告律师在美利坚合众国的无偿顾问。大卫富兰克林诉辉瑞公司，和华纳-兰伯特公司的帕克-戴维斯分部，并参与了加州大学弗朗西斯科分校卡尔加里维茨图书馆创建药品行业文件档案的工作，该工作部分由托马斯·格林资助，他的律师事务所代表大卫·富兰克林参与此案。斯坦曼博士还参加了由总检察长解决基金资助的教育赠款，该基金是由富兰克林案产生的。
In his article,“The Pitfalls of Deducing Ethics from Behavioral Economics: Why the Association of American Medical Colleges is Wrong about Pharmaceutical Detailing,” Thomas Huddle (2010) recapitulates several arguments against prohibiting drug detailing in academic medical centers. Briefly stated, Huddle argues that empiric data on the effects of detailing are not definitive, and that restricting interaction with sales representatives does not rise to the level of an “unqualified ethical imperative.” As a result, Huddle argues that professional ethics do not mandate an opposition to detailing, and that policy responses shouldAcknowledgments: Dr Steinman was supported by a career development award from the National Institute on Aging and the American Federation for Aging Research (K23 AG030999). Dr Schillinger was supported by NIH grant UL1 RR024131. Disclosure: Dr. Steinman served as an unpaid consultant to the plaintiff’s attorney in United States of America ex rel. David Franklin vs. Pfizer, Inc., and Parke-Davis Division of Warner-Lambert Company and participated in the creation of the Drug Industry Document Archive by the University of California, San Francisco Kalmanovitz Library, an effort that was funded in part by Thomas Greene, whose law firm represented David Franklin in the case. Dr. Steinman also participated in an educational grant funded by the Attorney General Settlement Fund that arose from the Franklin case.
影响因子：
13.4
作者：
Huddle, Thomas S.
通讯作者：
Huddle, Thomas S.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Majumdar, SR;McAlister, FA;Soumerai, SB
通讯作者：
Soumerai, SB
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
Fugh-Berman A;Ahari S
通讯作者：
Ahari S