The relationship between psychological flexibility, early maladaptive schemas, perceived parenting and psychopathology
The relationship between psychological flexibility, early maladaptive schemas, perceived parenting and psychopathology
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.06.002
复制
发表时间：
2016-07-01
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Delfabbro, Paul H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fischer, Timothy D.;Smout, Matthew F.;Delfabbro, Paul H.
背景资料：临床医生已经开始整合接受和承诺治疗（ACT）和图式治疗（ST），但一直没有实证调查到他们的理论processes.Aims之间的关系：本研究旨在探讨心理灵活性，感知父母的行为，早期适应不良的图式和精神病理学在非临床本科样本（N=117）。运用一系列结构方程模型，将心理灵活性作为潜变量进行测量（指标：接受与行动问卷（AAQ-II）、认知融合问卷（CFQ）、正念注意意识量表（MAAS）、价值取向问卷（VQ））对早期适应不良图式的影响既起中介作用，又起调节作用（EMS，指标：Young Schema问卷（YSQ-35））（指标：抑郁焦虑压力量表（DASS）），以及感知父母行为的影响结果：心理灵活性在EMS的心理病理学效应中起完全中介作用; EMS没有调解心理灵活性对精神病理学的影响。心理灵活性也完全介导了父母教养行为对EMS的影响，但EMS介导了父母教养行为对心理灵活性的影响的模型同样可行。简单斜率分析表明，EMS调节心理灵活性对精神病理学的影响。父母的行为是不是一个显着的预测EMS的心理灵活性测量时。这些结果值得在临床样本中进行探索，并使用纵向设计。(C)2016年，加入社会科学院。爱思唯尔公司出版All rights reserved.
Background: Clinicians have begun to integrate Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Schema Therapy (ST) but there has been no empirical investigation into the relationship between their theoretical processes.Aims: This study sought to explore the relationships between psychological flexibility, perceived parent behavior, early maladaptive schemas and psychopathology in a non-clinical undergraduate sample (N=117).Design: Cross-sectional, correlational. Using a series of structural equation models, psychological flexibility, measured as a latent variable (indicators: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ), Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Valuing Questionnaire (VQ)) was tested as both a mediator, and a moderator of the effect of Early Maladaptive Schemas (EMS, indicator: Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-35)) on psychopathology (indicator: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)), and of the effects of perceived parent behavior (indicator: Young Parenting Inventory (YPI)) on EMS.Results: Psychological flexibility fully mediated the effect of EMS on psychopathology; EMS did not mediate the effect of psychological flexibility on psychopathology. Psychological flexibility also fully mediated the effect of parenting behavior on EMS, however a model where EMS mediated the effect of parenting behavior on psychological flexibility was equally viable. Simple slopes analysis suggested EMS moderated the effect of psychological flexibility on psychopathology. Parent behavior was not a significant predictor of EMS when measured with psychological flexibility. These results warrant exploration in clinical samples and using longitudinal designs. (C) 2016 Association for Contextual Behavioral Science. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.