Automated Quantitative Assessment of Retinal Fluid Volumes as Important Biomarkers in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Automated Quantitative Assessment of Retinal Fluid Volumes as Important Biomarkers in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
复制标题
视网膜流体体积自动定量评估是与新血管相关的黄斑变性中重要的生物标志物。
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.012
复制
发表时间:
2021-04
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Schmidt-Erfurth U
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keenan TDL;Chakravarthy U;Loewenstein A;Chew EY;Schmidt-Erfurth U
To evaluate retinal fluid volume data extracted from OCT scans by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD). Perspective A review was performed of retinal image repository datasets from diverse clinical settings. clinical trial (HARBOR) and trial follow-on (AREDS2-10Y); real-world (Belfast and Tel-Aviv tertiary centers). 24362 scans of 1095 eyes (HARBOR); 4673 of 880 (Belfast); 1470 of 132 (Tel-Aviv); 511 of 511 (AREDS2-10Y). Vienna Fluid Monitor or Notal OCT Analyzer applied to macular cube scans. intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) volumes. The fluid volumes measured in neovascular AMD were expressed efficiently in nanoliters. Large ranges that differed by population were observed at the treatment-naïve stage: 0-3435nl (IRF), 0-5018nl (SRF), and 0-10022nl (PED). Mean volumes decreased rapidly and consistently with anti-VEGF therapy. During maintenance therapy, mean IRF volumes were highest in Tel-Aviv (100nl), lower in Belfast and HARBOR-PRN, and lowest in HARBOR-monthly (21nl). Mean SRF volumes were low in all: 30nl (HARBOR-monthly) and 48-49nl (others). Quantitative measures of IRF, SRF, and PED are important biomarkers in NV-AMD. Accurate volumes can be extracted efficiently from OCT scans by AI algorithms to guide the management of exudative macular diseases. Automated fluid monitoring identifies fluid characteristics in different NV-AMD populations at baseline and during follow-up. For consistency between studies, we propose the nanoliter as a convenient unit. We explore the advantages of using these quantitative metrics in clinical practice and research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Dugel, Pravin U.;Koh, Adrian;Holz, Frank G.
通讯作者:
Holz, Frank G.
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Keenan, Tiarnan D. L.;Clemons, Traci E.;Chew, Emily Y.
通讯作者:
Chew, Emily Y.
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Ho, Allen C.;Busbee, Brandon G.;Lai, Phillip
通讯作者:
Lai, Phillip
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Keenan, Tiarnan D.;Vitale, Susan;Chew, Emily Y.
通讯作者:
Chew, Emily Y.
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Fernández, DC
通讯作者:
Fernández, DC