Effects of fermented soybean meal and specialty animal protein sources on nursery pig performance

Effects of fermented soybean meal and specialty animal protein sources on nursery pig performance
复制标题

DOI:
10.2527/jas.2009-2110
复制
发表时间:
2010-05-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Goodband, R. D.
Goodband, R. D.
中科院分区:
农林科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jones, C. K.;DeRouchey, J. M.;Goodband, R. D.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在2个实验中,使用602头猪来评估鱼粉、发酵豆粕或干燥的猪可溶物对第2阶段保育猪性能的影响。在Exp. 1、保育猪(n = 252; PIC TR 4 x 1050; 6.8 kg初始BW和断奶后7天)饲喂:1)不含特殊蛋白质来源的对照饮食和含有2)5%鱼粉,3)3.5%干燥猪可溶物,4)6.0%发酵豆粕的对照饮食,5)1.75%发酵豆粕和1.75%干燥猪可溶物的组合,或6)3.0%发酵豆粕和2.5%鱼粉的组合。试验共设7个重复,每栏6头猪。试验日粮饲喂14 d后,所有试验猪饲喂不含特殊蛋白源的普通日粮14 d。从0 ~ 14日龄,与其它日粮相比,单独饲喂或与发酵豆粕配合饲喂干水溶物的猪的日增重和料肉比均有显著提高(P < 0.05)。总体而言(第0天至第28天),与饲喂对照饮食的猪相比,饲喂干燥猪可溶物的猪的ADG(421 vs 383 g)和G:F(0.77 vs 0.73)有所改善(P = 0.01),与饲喂发酵豆粕和鱼粉组合的猪相比,G:F(0.77 vs 0.74)有所改善(P = 0.03)。在Exp. 2、保育猪(n = 350; PIC C22 x 1050; 6.1kg初始体重和断奶后7天)饲喂1)不含特殊蛋白源的对照日粮和2)3%鱼粉,3)6%鱼粉,4)3.75%发酵豆粕,5)7.50%发酵豆粕,6)1.88%发酵大豆粉和1.88%干燥猪可溶物的组合,或7)3.75%发酵大豆粉和3.75%干燥猪可溶物的组合。试验共设10个重复,每个栏5头猪。试验日粮从0 ~ 14日龄开始饲喂,然后饲喂不含特殊蛋白源的普通日粮,试验期21 d。从第0天到第14天,饲喂增加鱼粉的猪的ADFI增加(二次,P = 0.05)。添加发酵豆粕的猪的G:F有显著提高(二次曲线,P = 0.01)。发酵豆粕与干猪可溶物配合饲喂组的日增重和料重比显著高于鱼粉组(P < 0.05),日增重和日采食量显著高于发酵豆粕组(P < 0.05)。总的来说(0 - 35天),饲喂发酵豆粕量增加的日粮的猪具有提高的(二次曲线,P = 0.03)G:F.与饲喂高浓度豆粕或鱼粉的仔猪相比,饲喂含有干燥猪可溶物的仔猪日粮,无论是单独还是与发酵豆粕结合,都可以提高生长性能。
In 2 experiments, 602 pigs were used to evaluate the effects of fish meal, fermented soybean meal, or dried porcine solubles on phase 2 nursery pig performance. In Exp. 1, nursery pigs (n = 252; PIC TR4 x 1050; 6.8 kg initial BW and 7 d after weaning) were fed: 1) a control diet containing no specialty protein sources and the control diet with 2) 5% fish meal, 3) 3.5% dried porcine solubles, 4) 6.0% fermented soybean meal, 5) a combination of 1.75% fermented soybean meal and 1.75% dried porcine solubles, or 6) a combination of 3.0% fermented soybean meal and 2.5% fish meal. There were 7 replications with 6 pigs per pen. Experimental diets were fed for 14 d, and then all pigs were fed a common diet without specialty protein sources for 14 d. From d 0 to 14, pigs fed dried porcine solubles alone or with fermented soybean meal had improved (P < 0.05) ADG and G: F compared with pigs fed all other diets. Overall (d 0 to 28), pigs fed dried porcine solubles had improved (P = 0.01) ADG (421 vs. 383 g) and G: F (0.77 vs. 0.73) compared with pigs fed the control diet and had improved (P = 0.03) G: F (0.77 vs. 0.74) compared with pigs fed the combination of fermented soybean meal and fish meal. In Exp. 2, nursery pigs (n = 350; PIC C22 x 1050; 6.1 kg initial BW and 7 d after weaning) were fed 1) a control diet containing no specialty protein sources and the control diet with 2) 3% fish meal, 3) 6% fish meal, 4) 3.75% fermented soybean meal, 5) 7.50% fermented soybean meal, 6) a combination of 1.88% fermented soybean meal and 1.88% dried porcine solubles, or 7) a combination of 3.75% fermented soybean meal and 3.75% dried porcine solubles. There were 10 replications with 5 pigs per pen. Experimental diets were fed from d 0 to 14, and then all pigs were fed a common diet without specialty protein sources for 21 d. From d 0 to 14, pigs fed increasing fish meal had increased (quadratic, P = 0.05) ADFI. Pigs fed increasing fermented soybean meal had improved (quadratic, P = 0.01) G: F. Pigs fed the combination of fermented soybean meal and dried porcine solubles had improved (P < 0.05) ADG and G: F compared with pigs fed diets containing fish meal and had improved (P < 0.05) ADG and ADFI compared with pigs fed diets containing fermented soybean meal. Overall (d 0 to 35), pigs fed diets with increasing amounts of fermented soybean meal had improved (quadratic, P = 0.03) G: F. Feeding nursery pigs diets containing dried porcine solubles, either alone or in combination with fermented soybean meal, can improve growth performance compared with those fed high concentrations of soybean meal or fish meal.