CHEATING BEHAVIOR, SUBJECT VARIABLES, AND COMPONENTS OF THE INTERNAL-EXTERNAL SCALE UNDER HIGH AND LOW-RISK CONDITIONS
CHEATING BEHAVIOR, SUBJECT VARIABLES, AND COMPONENTS OF THE INTERNAL-EXTERNAL SCALE UNDER HIGH AND LOW-RISK CONDITIONS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00220671.1980.10885288
复制
发表时间：
1980-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
LEMING, JS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
LEMING, JS
在两种情况下（高，低风险）的大学生（N = 153）进行了Rotter的内部-外部量表和哈茨霍恩和梅的圆圈测试。根据柯林斯分量表（1974）对I-E量表进行评分。作弊、I-E量表和柯林斯分量表之间唯一显著相关的是高风险条件下的难易世界分量表（r= 0.19）。这一发现与休斯顿的研究结果一致。结果发现，作弊是特定的情况下，受试者作弊更多的低风险条件下比高风险条件下。研究人员还分析了性别、学习能力和作弊行为之间的关系。在低风险条件下，女性作弊的次数明显多于男性。制裁威胁（高风险条件）被发现，以减少作弊的发生率只有妇女。作弊行为与学业能力无关，但在高风险条件下，高能力学生的作弊行为显著少于低风险条件下的作弊行为。
Under two conditions (high and low risk) college undergraduates (N = 153) were administered the Rotter Internal-External Scale and the circles test of Hartshorne and May. The I-E Scale was scored for the Collins subscales (1974). The only significant correlation between cheating, the I-E Scale, and the Collins subscales was on the difficult-easy world subscale under the high risk condition (r= .19). This finding was consistent with the findings of Houston. It was found that cheating was situationally specific; subjects cheated more under the low risk condition than under the high risk condition. The data were also analyzed with respect to the relationships between sex, academic ability, and cheating behavior. In the low risk condition women cheated significantly more than men. Sanction threats (high risk condition) were found to reduce the incidence of cheating only for women. Cheating behavior was not related to academic ability; however, under the high risk condition high ability students cheated significantly less than under the low risk condition.