Who goes first? a distributed simulator study of vehicle-pedestrian interaction.
Who goes first? a distributed simulator study of vehicle-pedestrian interaction.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107050
复制
发表时间：
2023-04
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Kalantari;Yue Yang;Jorge Garcia de Pedro;Yee Mun Lee;A. Horrobin;Albert Solernou;Christopher Holmes;N. Merat;G. Markkula
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Kalantari;Yue Yang;Jorge Garcia de Pedro;Yee Mun Lee;A. Horrobin;Albert Solernou;Christopher Holmes;N. Merat;G. Markkula
目前自动化的挑战之一是拥有高度自动化的车辆(HAVs)，能够有效地与行人沟通，并对行人行为的变化做出反应，以促进更值得信赖的HAVs。然而，关于人类司机和行人在无信号控制的十字路口如何互动的细节仍然知之甚少。我们通过将高保真的基于运动的驾驶模拟器连接到基于洞穴的行人实验室来复制这一挑战的某些方面，通过在安全和可控的虚拟环境中复制车辆与行人的互动，在该实验室中，参与者(32对一名司机和一名行人)在不同的场景下相互互动。受控环境帮助我们研究了运动学和优先规则对相互作用结果和行为的因果作用，这在自然主义研究中是不可能的。我们还发现，与感觉寻求和社会价值取向等心理特征相比，运动学线索在决定行人或司机是否在无标志十字路口率先通过方面发挥了更大的作用。这项研究的一个主要贡献是我们的实验范式，它允许重复观察每个驾驶员-行人参与者对交叉路口的相互作用，产生与自然主义研究观察到的定性一致的行为。
One of the current challenges of automation is to have highly automated vehicles (HAVs) that communicate effectively with pedestrians and react to changes in pedestrian behaviour, to promote more trustable HAVs. However, the details of how human drivers and pedestrians interact at unsignalised crossings remain poorly understood. We addressed some aspects of this challenge by replicating vehicle–pedestrian interactions in a safe and controlled virtual environment by connecting a high fidelity motion-based driving simulator to a CAVE-based pedestrian lab in which 64 participants (32 pairs of one driver and one pedestrian) interacted with each other under different scenarios. The controlled setting helped us study the causal role of kinematics and priority rules on interaction outcome and behaviour, something that is not possible in naturalistic studies. We also found that kinematic cues played a stronger role than psychological traits like sensation seeking and social value orientation in determining whether the pedestrian or driver passed first at unmarked crossings. One main contribution of this study is our experimental paradigm, which permitted repeated observation of crossing interactions by each driver-pedestrian participant pair, yielding behaviours which were qualitatively in line with observations from naturalistic studies.