TRANSFORMATION PSEUDO-ELASTICITY AND DEFORMATION-BEHAVIOR IN A TI-50.6AT-PERCENT NI-ALLOY
TRANSFORMATION PSEUDO-ELASTICITY AND DEFORMATION-BEHAVIOR IN A TI-50.6AT-PERCENT NI-ALLOY
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0036-9748(81)90346-x
复制
发表时间:
1981-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
SUZUKI, Y
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
MIYAZAKI, S;OTSUKA, K;SUZUKI, Y
The Ti-Ni alloy is so famous with the associated shape memory effect. In fact it is the only alloy which is used for the practical applications of the shape memory effect on a commercial basis at present, such as coupling, connectors and medical applications (1). In order to develop such applications, it is necessary to investigate mechanical behavior associated with the martensitic transformation and/or in the martensitic state. Various investigations have been made along this line so far, but the number and scope of these investigations are not very many nor so deep from a fundamental point of view. Rozner and Wasflewski (2), and Cross et al.(3) made rather systematic works on the stress-strain curves (SS curves) in wide temperature and strain ranges. They found that the SS curves in the Ti-Ni alloys consisted of three stages which are apparantly similar to three stages in FCC and HCP single crystals. However, they did not study the unloading process, and did not clarify the nature of these stages. The presence of the transformation pseudoelasticity (4) in Ti-51at% Ni and Ti-52at% Ni alloys has been reported by Wasflewski (5) and Honma (8) respectively, but no detailed data such as the temperature dependence etc. have been reported. The purpose of the present short note is to report the transformation pseudoelasticity in this alloy in some dstafl, and to clarify the nature of the three stages by carefully observing the stress-strain curves upon loading and unloading and by measuring the strains recovered upon unloading and subsequent heating.After the pioneering works by Rozner and Wasilewski, and Cross et al., several investigations have bean made to clarify the nature of each stage. Although it is not well established as yet, we summarize those in the following. Mohamed arid Washburn (7) have provided evidence that the martensite-martensite interface moves in the early stage (stage I) of an initially partially transformed material. Some authors (7, 8) have suggested that the deformation in stage H is an elastic deformation of the martensites formed in stage I. But Melton and Mercier (9) reported evidence inconsistent with the above suggestion. They observed microstructure in a specimen deformed into stage H by transmission electron microscopy and found an intersecting array of martensite laths in some part and dislocations in another part. However, their observation is limited to a small region of stage II, and the deformation modes throughout the stage H are not weU clarified. On stage HI, Mohamed and Washburn (7) made an electron microscopy observation of specimens elongated by 8% and found heavy irregularity of martensite boundaries. Thus they suggested that slip occurred at the stage HI. Michael (10) and Tadaki and Wayman (11) also made the electron microscopy observation of heavily cold-rolled (--30%) specimens, which roughly corresponded to stage HI in tensile tests. They both found high density of dislocations and the segmentation of martensites. These results are clear evidence to show that slip occurs in stage HI, but are lacking for the qualitative data by tensile tests as to the recovery of strains. Meanwhile, apparently quite similar three stage stress-strain curves are reported in Cu-A1-Ni single crystals in specific orientations; the deformation modes in stages H and HI in this case are proved unambiguously to be due to the elastic deformation of a martensite and martenalte-to-martensite transformation, respectively, by careful measurement of strains by extensometer and neutron diffraction under stress (4). It is interesting to compare the nature of the three stages in the Ti-Ni alloy with those in the above case.