Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet
Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-9280.00176
复制
发表时间：
1999-09-01
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
Birnbaum, MH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Birnbaum, MH
本文回顾了最近的研究结果，违反了广泛的一类描述性理论的决策。一项新的研究比较了通过互联网测试的1,224名参与者和在实验室测试的124名大学生。两个样本都证实了随机优势和累积独立性的系统性违反;新的测试还发现了合并的违反。互联网样本年龄更大，受教育程度更高，更可能是男性，并且比实验室样本更具人口统计学多样性。网络参与者比大学生更倾向于选择期望值更高的赌博，但没有人完全符合期望值。违反随机优势减少教育的增加，但违反随机优势和合并仍然是大量的人与博士学位谁读了科学工作的决策。互联网研究和实验室研究的结果一致认为：描述性决策理论不能假设可以合并相同的结果。
This article reviews recent findings that violate a broad class of descriptive theories of decision making. A new study compared 1,224 participants tested via the Internet and 124 undergraduates tested in the laboratory Both samples confirmed systematic violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence; new tests also found violations of coalescing. The Internet sample was older; more highly educated, more likely male, and also more demographically diverse than the lab sample. Internet participants were more likely than undergraduates to choose the gamble with higher expected value, but no one conformed exactly to expected value. Violations of stochastic dominance decreased as education increased but violations of stochastic dominance and coalescing were still substantial in persons with doctoral degrees who had read a scientific work on decision making. in their implications, Internet research and lab findings agree: Descriptive decision theories cannot assume that identical consequences can be coalesced.