Evidence‐based reasoning: Eliciting STEM content during engineering design justifications
Evidence‐based reasoning: Eliciting STEM content during engineering design justifications
复制标题
循证推理：在工程设计论证过程中引出 STEM 内容
DOI：
10.1111/ssm.12378
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
K. Douglas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Moore;Emilie A. Siverling;K. Douglas
循证推理：在工程设计论证过程中引出STEM内容：基于已出版的SSM期刊研究手册：学生在工程设计中使用STEM内容的设计论证基于STEM的集成工程有可能成为学生学习中科学和数学的自然集成者。在Siverling等人研究的研究问题。([4])洗涤：在基于工程设计的STEM集成单元中生成和证明工程设计问题的解决方案时，小学生和中学生讨论的STEM内容是什么？[摘自文章]学校科学与数学的版权是威利-布莱克威尔的财产，其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或未经版权保持器的明确书面许可发布到一个列表服务器。但是，用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这篇摘要可以删节。不保证副本的准确性。用户应参考材料的原始出版版本以获取完整摘要。版权适用于所有摘要。
Evidence-based reasoning: Eliciting STEM content during engineering design justifications: Based on the published SSM Journal Research Manuscript: Students' use of STEM content in design justifications during engineering design-based STEM integration Engineering has the potential to be a natural integrator of science and mathematics in student learning. The research question studied in Siverling et al.([4]) was: While generating and justifying solutions to engineering design problems in engineering design-based STEM integration units, what STEM content do elementary and middle school students discuss?.[Extracted from the article]Copyright of School Science & Mathematics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. Copyright applies to all Abstracts.