Clinical neurophysiological assessment of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a systematic review.
Clinical neurophysiological assessment of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a systematic review.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/s13054-014-0674-y
复制
发表时间:
2014-12-08
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Taccone FS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hosokawa K;Gaspard N;Su F;Oddo M;Vincent JL;Taccone FS
Several studies have reported the presence of electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities or altered evoked potentials (EPs) during sepsis. However, the role of these tests in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy remains unclear. We performed a systematic search for studies evaluating EEG and/or EPs in adult (≥18 years) patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. The following outcomes were extracted: a) incidence of EEG/EP abnormalities; b) diagnosis of sepsis-associated delirium or encephalopathy with EEG/EP; c) outcome. Among 1976 citations, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of EEG abnormalities during sepsis ranged from 12% to 100% for background abnormality and 6% to 12% for presence of triphasic waves. Two studies found that epileptiform discharges and electrographic seizures were more common in critically ill patients with than without sepsis. In one study, EEG background abnormalities were related to the presence and the severity of encephalopathy. Background slowing or suppression and the presence of triphasic waves were also associated with higher mortality. A few studies demonstrated that quantitative EEG analysis and EP could show significant differences in patients with sepsis compared to controls but their association with encephalopathy and outcome was not evaluated. Abnormalities in EEG and EPs are present in the majority of septic patients. There is some evidence to support EEG use in the detection and prognostication of sepsis-associated encephalopathy, but further clinical investigation is needed to confirm this suggestion.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Barr, Juliana;Fraser, Gilles L.;Jaeschke, Roman
通讯作者:
Jaeschke, Roman
影响因子:
15.8
作者:
Liberati A;Altman DG;Tetzlaff J;Mulrow C;Gøtzsche PC;Ioannidis JP;Clarke M;Devereaux PJ;Kleijnen J;Moher D
通讯作者:
Moher D
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Akeju O;Pavone KJ;Westover MB;Vazquez R;Prerau MJ;Harrell PG;Hartnack KE;Rhee J;Sampson AL;Habeeb K;Gao L;Pierce ET;Walsh JL;Brown EN;Purdon PL
通讯作者:
Purdon PL
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
Foreman, Brandon;Claassen, Jan;Hirsch, Lawrence J.
通讯作者:
Hirsch, Lawrence J.
影响因子:
38.9
作者:
Kurtz, Pedro;Gaspard, Nicolas;Claassen, Jan
通讯作者:
Claassen, Jan