Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides.
Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/srep33634
复制
发表时间:
2016-09-20
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Roberts DL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Austen GE;Bindemann M;Griffiths RA;Roberts DL
Accurate species identification is fundamental when recording ecological data. However, the ability to correctly identify organisms visually is rarely questioned. We investigated how experts and non-experts compared in the identification of bumblebees, a group of insects of considerable conservation concern. Experts and non-experts were asked whether two concurrent bumblebee images depicted the same or two different species. Overall accuracy was below 60% and comparable for experts and non-experts. However, experts were more consistent in their answers when the same images were repeated, and more cautious in committing to a definitive answer. Our findings demonstrate the difficulty of correctly identifying bumblebees using images from field guides. Such error rates need to be accounted for when interpreting species data, whether or not they have been collected by experts. We suggest that investigation of how experts and non-experts make observations should be incorporated into study design, and could be used to improve training in species identification.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Butchart, Stuart H. M.;Walpole, Matt;Watson, Reg
通讯作者:
Watson, Reg
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Lee, Tamsin E.;Black, Simon A.;Roberts, David L.
通讯作者:
Roberts, David L.
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Beerkircher, Lawrence;Arocha, Freddy;Shivjl, Mahmood
通讯作者:
Shivjl, Mahmood
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Culverhouse, PF;Williams, R;González-Gil, S
通讯作者:
González-Gil, S
影响因子:
6.5
作者:
Kelling S;Fink D;La Sorte FA;Johnston A;Bruns NE;Hochachka WM
通讯作者:
Hochachka WM