Temporal Effects of Perpetrating or Receiving Intimate Partner Aggression on Alcohol Consumption: A Daily Diary Study of Community Couples
Temporal Effects of Perpetrating or Receiving Intimate Partner Aggression on Alcohol Consumption: A Daily Diary Study of Community Couples
复制标题
DOI：
10.15288/jsad.2017.78.213
复制
发表时间：
2017-03-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Testa, Maria
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Derrick, Jaye L.;Testa, Maria
目的：调查研究提供证据表明，经历亲密伴侣攻击（IPA）有助于随后的酒精使用。然而，尚不清楚酒精使用量随时间的增加是否反映了IPA的时间效应。我们研究了语言和身体IPA作为未来几小时内饮酒和大量饮酒的预测因素。我们还调查了受害者和肇事者是否都在IPA之后喝酒，以及是否重要的是哪个合作伙伴报告了侵略行为。方法：这里报告的数据来自一项为期56天的日记研究，研究了118对异性恋夫妇的饮酒和伴侣攻击之间的关系。我们研究了在给定的一个小时内的酒精使用是否可以通过IPA在过去的3个小时内预测，考虑到受害者/肇事者的地位，报告的来源（自我，其他）和性别。结果如下：受害者在一个小时内使用酒精的可能性是他们报告在过去3小时内收到口头IPA的两倍，独立于肇事者的报告。同样，无论受害者的报告如何，当犯罪者报告在过去3小时内进行过口头IPA时，他们在给定小时内饮酒的可能性是其他人的两倍多。当考虑到相互IPA的报告时，结果相似。口头IPA增加了饮酒的可能性，但不会增加大量饮酒的可能性。物理IPA的结果不显著。结论：口头EPA是一个近端的预测酒精使用的受害者和肇事者。然而，只有当个人报告侵略，而不是当他们的合作伙伴提供唯一的报告，强调个人的IPA的看法的重要性，效果出现。
Objective: Survey studies provide evidence that experiencing intimate partner aggression (IPA) contributes to subsequent alcohol use. However, it is unknown whether the increase in alcohol use over time reflects a temporal effect of IPA. We examined verbal and physical IPA as predictors of alcohol use and heavy drinking within the next few hours. We also investigated whether both victims and perpetrators drank following IPA, and if it mattered which partner reported the aggression. Method: The data reported here were derived from a 56-day diary study examining the association between alcohol use and partner aggression in 118 heterosexual couples. We examined whether alcohol use in a given hour could be predicted by IPA in the previous 3 hours, taking into account victim/perpetrator status, source of the report (self, other), and gender. Results: Victims were twice as likely to use alcohol in a given hour when they reported having received verbal IPA in the previous 3 hours, independent of the perpetrator's report. Similarly, perpetrators were more than twice as likely to use alcohol in a given hour when they reported having perpetrated verbal IPA in the previous 3 hours, independent of the victim's report. Results were similar when reports of mutual IPA were considered. Verbal IPA increased the likelihood of drinking but not the likelihood of heavy drinking. Results for physical IPA were not significant. Conclusions: Verbal EPA is a proximal predictor of alcohol use for both victims and perpetrators. However, effects emerge only when individuals report aggression, and not when their partner provides the sole report, emphasizing the importance of the individual's perception of IPA.