Development and Validation of a Simple Convenience Store SHELF Audit

Development and Validation of a Simple Convenience Store SHELF Audit
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph15122676
复制
发表时间:
2018-12-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brown, Onikia
Brown, Onikia
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Horacek, Tanya M.;Yildirim, Elif Dede;Brown, Onikia

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景本文介绍了一个实用工具的发展,可靠性和收敛效度的便利店支持健康环境促进生命的食品(SHELF)审计。方法审核项目包括:各种新鲜、加工和冷冻水果和蔬菜;低脂乳制品;健康主食和冷冻餐;健康食品激励计划;在结账区出售的物品;份量/杯子大小;和定价。每个审计项目使用五点语义差异量表进行评分(1 =对健康食品提供很少或没有支持,5 =对健康食品提供高度支持)。通过比较SHELF审计与Ghirardelli等人和Laska等人的商店审计来检查收敛有效性。统计分析包括:因子分析,方差分析,和斯皮尔曼相关。结果SHELF包括三个因素:水果/蔬菜量表(8个项目,= 0.79,总潜能点= 34);健康食品量表(4个项目,= 0.72,总潜能点= 16);支持量表(4个项目,= 0.685,总潜能点= 16)。在124家被评估的便利店中,只有6%的商店得分在最健康的范围内(46 - 66)。评估的药店(n = 15)得分高于便利店(n = 81)的健康食品和支持规模,但不是水果/蔬菜规模。SHELF分项得分与其他审计工具高度相关,表明收敛效度。结论SHELF便利店审计是一个有效的,可靠的工具,评估便利店支持健康的程度,水果/蔬菜,健康食品,并支持选择健康。
Background This paper describes the development, reliability, and convergent validity of a practical toolthe Convenience Store Supportive Healthy Environment for Life-Promoting Food (SHELF) Audit. Methods Audit items included: a variety of fresh, processed, and frozen fruits and vegetables; low-fat dairy products; healthy staples and frozen meals; healthy food incentive programs; items sold in check-out areas; portion/cup sizes; and pricing. Each audit item was scored using a five-point semantic-differential scale (1 = provides little or no support for healthful foods to 5 = provides high support for healthful foods). Convergent validity was examined by comparing the SHELF audit to Ghirardelli et al. and Laska et al. store audits. Statistical analysis included: Factor analysis, ANOVA, and Spearman correlations. Results SHELF included three factors: a Fruits/Vegetables scale (eight items, = 0.79; total potential points = 34); a Healthy Foods scale (four items, = 0.72; total potential points = 16); and a Supports scale (four items, = 0.685; total potential points = 16). Only 6% of the 124 convenience stores assessed scored in the most healthful range (46-66). The assessed drug stores (n = 15) scored higher than convenience stores (n = 81) on the Healthy Foods and Supports scales but not the Fruits/Vegetables scale. The SHELF sub-scores were highly correlated with other audit tools indicating convergent validity. Conclusion The SHELF convenience store audit is a valid, reliable tool for assessing the degree to which convenience stores support healthfulness regarding Fruits/Vegetables, Healthy Foods, and Supports for choosing healthy.