The dark side of emotion in decision-making: When individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions

The dark side of emotion in decision-making: When individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.006
复制
发表时间:
2005-04-01
期刊:
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bechara, A
Bechara, A
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shiv, B;Loewenstein, G;Bechara, A

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在某些情况下,附属于情绪的神经系统功能障碍会导致更有利的决定吗?为了回答这个问题,我们调查了物质依赖患者(ISD)、情绪相关脑区稳定灶性病变患者(病变患者)和正常参与者(正常对照组)如何做出20轮投资决定。与病变患者一样,ISD做出了更有利的决定,最终从他们的投资中赚取了比正常对照组更多的钱。当正常对照组在一轮投资中获胜或亏损时,他们采取了保守的策略,变得更加不愿在下一轮投资,这表明他们比病变患者和ISD更受前几轮决策结果的影响。(C)2005 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。
Can dysfunction in neural systems subserving emotion lead, under certain circumstances, to more advantageous decisions? To answer this question, we investigated how individuals with substance dependence (ISD), patients with stable focal lesions in brain regions related to emotion (lesion patients), and normal participants (normal controls) made 20 rounds of investment decisions. Like lesion patients, ISD made more advantageous decisions and ultimately earned more money from their investments than the normal controls. When normal controls either won or lost money on an investment round, they adopted a conservative strategy and became more reluctant to invest on the subsequent round, suggesting that they were more affected than lesion patients and ISD by the outcomes of decisions made in the previous rounds. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.