Community-University Partnership Characteristics for Translation: Evidence From CDC's Prevention Research Centers
Community-University Partnership Characteristics for Translation: Evidence From CDC's Prevention Research Centers
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpubh.2020.00079
复制
发表时间：
2020-03-20
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Ulin, Brigette F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Young, Belinda-Rose;Leeks, Kimberly D.;Ulin, Brigette F.
背景资料：疾病控制和预防中心的预防研究中心（PRC）计划支持社区参与和伙伴关系，将健康证据转化为实践。翻译取决于伙伴关系的质量。然而，问题仍然存在的必要特征，以发展和维持translation partnerships.Aim：To identify the characteristics that influence community-university partnerships and examine alignment with the Knowledge to Action（K2 A）Framework.Methods：Final Progress Reports（N = 37）from PRC funded from September 2009 to September 2014 were reviewed in 2016-2017 to determine eligibility.符合条件的PRC包括那些在PRC奖项的应用研究阶段（2009-2014）之后翻译创新的PRC（n = 12）。PRC和收养人（即，结果：10个PRCs（83.3%）和4个收养者参与了定性访谈。12个代码（即，元素），影响了翻译连续体沿着的伙伴关系（例如，适当的沟通和技术援助）。在翻译阶段的多个步骤中，每个元素都与K2 A框架保持一致。在平移阶段中元素和步骤之间的交叉点被称为“特征”。“使用访谈数据，52个独特的翻译合作伙伴关系的特点被发现。讨论和结论：结果表明，影响翻译合作伙伴关系的多种特征。将这些伙伴关系的特点纳入政策和做法，以寻求将基于实践或基于研究的证据推广使用，可能会影响伙伴的接受程度和社区对证据的吸收。使用K2 A框架评估翻译合作伙伴关系是有帮助的，可以在过程评估中考虑，以告知翻译合作伙伴关系的改进。
Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Prevention Research Centers (PRC) Program supports community engagement and partnerships to translate health evidence into practice. Translation is dependent on the quality of partnerships. However, questions remain about the necessary characteristics to develop and maintain translation partnerships.Aim: To identify the characteristics that influence community-university partnerships and examine alignment with the Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework.Methods: Final Progress Reports (N = 37) from PRCs funded from September 2009 to September 2014 were reviewed in 2016-2017 to determine eligibility. Eligible PRCs included those that translated an innovation following the applied research phase (2009-2014) of the PRC award (n = 12). The PRCs and the adopters (i.e., community organizations) were recruited and participated in qualitative interviews in 2017.Results: Ten PRCs (83.3% response rate) and four adopters participated. Twelve codes (i.e., elements) were found that impacted partnerships along the translation continuum (e.g., adequate communication, technical assistance). Each element aligned with the K2A Framework at multiple steps within the translation phase. The intersection between the element and step in the translation phase is termed a "characteristic." Using interview data, fifty-two unique partnership characteristics for translation were found.Discussion and Conclusion: The results suggest multiple characteristics that impact translation partnerships. The inclusion of these partnership characteristics in policies and practices that seek to move practice-based or research-based evidence into widespread use may impact the receptivity by partners and evidence uptake by communities. Using the K2A Framework to assess translation partnerships was helpful and could be considered in process evaluations to inform translation partnership improvement.