Measuring time perspective in adolescents: Can you get the right answer by asking the wrong questions?
Measuring time perspective in adolescents: Can you get the right answer by asking the wrong questions?
复制标题
衡量青少年的时间观念：通过提出错误的问题你能得到正确的答案吗？
DOI：
10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.015
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Bojan Musil
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Perry;M. McKay;F. Worrell;Urška Živkovič;Zena R. Mello;Bojan Musil
时间洞察力作为一种心理概念继续发展。现有的文献表明，较高的未来取向和较低的现在取向与更好的发展结果相关。然而，现有的文献也表明，对结构的测量仍然存在问题。最近，基于意大利青少年样本的高内部一致性估计和良好的区分效度，建议使用由25个条目组成的津巴多时间透视问卷(ZTPI-25)。然而，这一规模的来源尚不确定。本研究考察了ZTPI-25在斯洛文尼亚、美国和英国青少年中的因素效度、信度和同时效度。结果显示，基于与完整ZTPI开发中使用的措施的相关性，具有令人满意的同时效度。然而，得分的内部一致性和因素效度并不令人满意。本研究在更广泛的概念和测量问题的背景下对ZTPI-25在青少年中的使用提出了质疑。
Time perspective continues to evolve as a psychological construct. The extant literature suggests that higher future orientation and lower present orientation are associated with better developmental outcomes. However, the extant literature also suggests that issues remain with the measurement of the construct. Recently, a 25-item version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI-25) was suggested for use based on high internal consistency estimates and good discriminant validity of scores in a sample of Italian adolescents. However, the genesis of this scale is uncertain. The present study examined the factorial validity, reliability, and concurrent validity of ZTPI-25 scores in Slovenian, American, and British adolescents. Results revealed satisfactory concurrent validity based on correlations with measures used in the development of the full ZTPI. However, internal consistency and factorial validity of scores were unsatisfactory. The present study questions the use of the ZTPI-25 with adolescents in the context of conceptual and measurement issues more broadly.
DOI：
10.1080/10705510903008220
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Marsh, Herbert W.;Muthen, Bengt;Trautwein, Ulrich
通讯作者：
Trautwein, Ulrich