Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach

Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach
复制标题

信任信息源作为信任的来源:模糊方法

DOI:
10.1145/860575.860590
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
ArXiv
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. Pezzulo
G. Pezzulo
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Castelfranchi;R. Falcone;G. Pezzulo

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文的目的是展示如何相关的是一个信任模型的基础上的信念和他们的可信度。信任的研究方法是多种多样的,彼此非常不同。在我们看来,只有对信任的社会认知方法才能够分析最终决定信任与否的子组件。在本文中,我们展示了我们的社会认知模型的信任开发使用所谓的模糊认知地图的实施。该模型允许区分内部归因和外部归因,并且它引入了来自信任信念的可信度的信任度,而信念的可信度来自其来源和来源的数量,收敛性,可靠性(即信任)。通过此实现,我们展示了不同组件如何变化以及它们的影响如何根据具体情况和代理而变化。或者个性。特别是,我们分析了不同性质的信仰来源和他们的可信度。我们假设了不同类型的信念来源。对于每一个信任者的信念,应该考虑信念的内容是什么,来源是谁/什么,这个来源如何评估信念,信任者如何评估这个来源(关于这个信念)。此外,为了考虑不同来源的贡献,我们需要一个关于它们如何结合的理论。本文中有趣的事情是,从寻找信任的来源开始,我们必须考虑这些来源的可信度。
The aim of this paper is to show how relevant is a trust model based on beliefs and their credibility.The approaches to the study of trust are various and very different from each of other. In our view, just a socio-cognitive approach to trust would be able to analyse the sub-components on which the final decision to trust or not is taken. In this paper we show an implementation of our socio-cognitive model of trust developed using the so-called Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. The model allows to distinguish between internal and external attributions and it introduced a degree of trust derived from the credibility of the trust beliefs, while the credibility of the beliefs derives from their sources and the sources' number, convergence, reliability (i.e. trust).With this implementation we show how the different components may change and how their impact can change depending on the specific situation and from the agent heuristics or personality. In particular, we analyse the different nature of the belief sources and their trustworthiness. We assumed different types of belief sources. For each trustier's belief one should consider what the content of the belief is, who/what the source is, how this source evaluates the belief, how the trustier evaluates this source (with respect to this belief). In addition for considering the contribution of different sources we need a theory of how they combine. The interesting thing in this paper is that starting from finding the sources of trust we are obliged to consider the trustworthiness of these sources.