The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes
复制标题
DOI：
10.1348/014466606x130346
复制
发表时间：
2007-06-01
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
De Bruycker, Els
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Houwer, Jan;De Bruycker, Els
我们使用外部情感西蒙任务（EAST）和内隐联想测验（IAT）作为对政党（实验1），食物（实验2）和同性恋（实验3）的态度的个体间差异的内隐措施。IAT，但不是EAST分数相关的相应的态度（实验1-3）和自我报告的行为（实验2和3）的自我报告的措施，在一个有意义的方式。IAT评分的分半信度令人满意，而EAST评分的分半信度总体较低。目前的研究结果表明，EAST介绍了德Houwer（2003年b，实验心理学）并没有提供一个很好的替代IAT作为一个内隐测量个体间的态度差异。
We used both the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as implicit measures of inter-individual differences in attitudes towards political parties (Experiment 1), food items (Experiment 2) and homosexuality (Experiment 3). IAT but not EAST scores were related in a meaningful manner to self-report measures of the corresponding attitudes (Experiments 1-3) and self-reported behaviour (Experiments 2 and 3). Whereas split-half reliability of the IAT scores was satisfactory, EAST scores overall had a low split-half reliability. The present results suggest that the EAST as introduced by De Houwer (2003b, Experimental Psychology) does not offer a good alternative for the IAT as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.