Hedging one's bets too much? A reply to Levelt (2002)
Hedging one's bets too much? A reply to Levelt (2002)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01690960143000461
复制
发表时间：
2002-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Caramazza, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alario, FX;Costa, A;Caramazza, A
Levelt(2002)对Alario，Costa和Caramazza(2002)关于言语产生过程中的话语规划的理论动机和对数据的解释提出了质疑。在这一回应中，我们反对这些批评。首先，我们表明，在当前的语音产生理论的背景下，我们研究中关于语音编码范围的假设是有良好动机的。其次，我们认为，尽管我们报告的频率效应在逻辑上是可能的，但现有的经验证据表明，这些解释是不太可能的。
Levelt (2002) challenges the theoretical motivation and the interpretation of the data reported in Alario, Costa, and Caramazza's (2002) study on utterance planning during speech production. In this response we argue against these criticisms. First, we show that the hypotheses entertained in our research about the scope of phonological encoding are well motivated in the context of current theories of speech production. Second, we argue that although alternative interpretations of the frequency effect we report are logically possible, the available empirical evidence makes them very unlikely.