Open Science and Intervention Research: a Program Developer's and Researcher's Perspective on Issues and Concerns.
Open Science and Intervention Research: a Program Developer's and Researcher's Perspective on Issues and Concerns.
复制标题
开放科学和干预研究：项目开发人员和研究人员对问题和担忧的观点。
DOI：
10.1007/s11121-021-01219-6
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lochman,JohnE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lochman,JohnE
开放科学实践在使研究更具可复制性和透明度方面具有很大的前景，这些目标对于预防性干预研究非常重要。从我作为项目合作开发者的角度来看，我注意到了如何在干预研究中使用开放科学实践的潜在问题和问题。考虑的关键问题是在预登记领域（使预登记成为一个活的文件;除了假设检验研究之外，还为假设生成研究提供奖励），数据存档（大型数据集数据存档的资源;与需要强有力的去识别相关的伦理问题），以及研究材料（干预手册和材料，以及干预人员的特征，培训和监督）。本文件着重于这三个领域中较难解决和相当难解决的问题和关切。
Open Science practices bear great promise for making research in general more reproducible and transparent, and these goals are very important for preventive intervention research. From my perspective as a program co-developer, I note potential concerns and issues of how open science practices can be used in intervention research. Key issues considered are in the realms of pre-registration (making pre-registration a living document; providing rewards for hypothesis-generating research, in addition to hypothesis-testing research), data archiving (resources for data archiving of large datasets; ethical issues related to need for strong de-identification), and research materials (intervention manuals and materials, and characteristics, training and supervision of intervention staff). The paper focuses on easier-to-address and considerably harder-to-address issues and concerns in these three areas.