Thinking Three, Revisited Infants, Coparents, Gender Roles, and Cultural Contexts.
Thinking Three, Revisited Infants, Coparents, Gender Roles, and Cultural Contexts.
复制标题
思考三，重新审视婴儿、同父母、性别角色和文化背景。
DOI：
10.1002/anzf.1566
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jenkins,KaceyL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McHale,JamesP;Jenkins,KaceyL
从20世纪90年代中期开始，在米努钦的结构家庭理论的指导下，合作理论和研究深化了发展心理学领域的社会化视角。配对理论可能在婴幼儿家庭心理健康领域产生了最大的影响，在这一领域，对配对和家庭层面动态的实证调查与对家庭联盟和三角关系的研究相吻合，并启发了创造性的干预措施，以支持婴幼儿家庭。在这篇文章中，作者回顾了一些早期关于婴儿时期的共生和三角互动的描述，强调了在家庭治疗领域中发现的类似概念化的对称性。文章强调了从婴儿家庭心理健康文献中预测出的关键概念和教训，这些文献对家庭治疗的实践具有价值，文章还承认了主导欧洲和西方的偏见，这种偏见塑造了迄今为止许多现存的文学作品。结束语部分讨论了两个需要婴儿家庭心理健康专家和家庭治疗师更加协调一致地关注的重要领域--与其核心自我定义相关的男性心理因素被低估和误解，以及正常家庭过程中的文化差异。在这两种情况下，如果帮助专业人员误读或误解，接受治疗服务的人可能会经历共鸣失败。
Tracing its beginnings to the mid‐1990s, coparenting theory and research, guided greatly by Minuchin's structural family theory, have deepened socialisation perspectives in the field of developmental psychology. Coparenting theory has perhaps had its largest impact in the field of infant‐family mental health, where empirical investigations of coparenting and family‐level dynamics have dovetailed with studies of family alliances and triangles and inspired creative interventions to support families of infants and toddlers. In this article, the authors retrace some of the early accounts of coparenting and triangular interactions during infancy, highlighting symmetries with analogue conceptualisations discovered in the field of family therapy. Emphasising key concepts and lessons divined from the infant‐family mental health literature holding value for the practice of family therapy, the article also recognises the dominant Euro‐Western bias that has shaped much of the extant literature to date. A closing section addresses two important areas calling for more concerted attention by infant‐family mental health experts and family therapists alike – under‐appreciated and misunderstood elements of men's psychology connected to their core self‐definition, and cultural distinctions in normal family processes. In both cases, if misread or misunderstood by the helping professional, the recipients of therapeutic services may experience failures of empathy.