Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services

Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107438
复制
发表时间:
2022-07
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Xiaoyu Wang;Jian Peng;Yuhang Luo;Sijing Qiu;Jianquan Dong;Zimo Zhang;K. Vercruysse;R. Grabowski;J. Meersmans
Xiaoyu Wang;Jian Peng;Yuhang Luo;Sijing Qiu;Jianquan Dong;Zimo Zhang;K. Vercruysse;R. Grabowski;J. Meersmans
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xiaoyu Wang;Jian Peng;Yuhang Luo;Sijing Qiu;Jianquan Dong;Zimo Zhang;K. Vercruysse;R. Grabowski;J. Meersmans

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

深入了解生态系统服务相互作用的复杂模式(即,在社会生态条件基础上进行协调(协同或权衡)是实现可持续和多功能景观的重要先决条件。本研究旨在探讨社会生态因素如何影响ESs的相互作用。以Sutlej-Beas河流域为案例研究区域,其中ESs相互作用和社会生态过程之间的联系知之甚少,ESs相互作用通过主成分分析确定,并与一系列社会生态因素相关,这些因素在空间上基于ES束进行了探索。研究结果揭示了两种主要类型的ES相互作用,即多功能相关的协同作用和粮食生产相关的权衡。人口,夜间光照,降水,温度和土壤粘粒含量都与两个ES的相互作用呈正相关。海拔和土壤砂粒含量与两种生态系统交互作用呈显著负相关。确定了四个主要的ES束,它们在空间上描述了ES协同作用和/或与社会生态因素相关的权衡的存在。该研究为探讨生态系统间相互作用的空间分异及其影响因素提供了可行的途径,为生态系统的流域综合管理提供了依据。
An in-depth understanding of the complex patterns of ecosystem services (ESs) interactions (i.e., synergies or trade-offs) based on social-ecological conditions is an important prerequisite for achieving sustainable and multifunctional landscapes. This study aimed to explore how ESs interactions are influenced by social-ecological factors. Taking the Sutlej-Beas River Basin as a case study area, where the linkages between ESs interactions and social-ecological processes are poorly understood, ESs interactions were identified through principal component analysis and correlated with a range of social-ecological factors, which were explored spatially based on ES bundles. The results revealed two dominant types of ESs interactions, namely multifunctionality-related synergies and grain production-related trade-offs. Population, nighttime light, precipitation, temperature, and soil clay content were all positively correlated with the two ESs interactions. Contrarily, elevation and soil sand content were negatively correlated with the two ESs interactions. Four main ES bundles were identified, which spatially describe the presence of ESs synergies and/or trade-offs in relation to social-ecological factors. This study provides a feasible way to explore the spatial differentiation and influencing factors impacting the interactions between ESs, which can provide a basis for an integrated watershed-based management of ESs.