Power, Politics and Knowledge Claims: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in theSDGEra

Power, Politics and Knowledge Claims: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in theSDGEra
复制标题

权力、政治和知识主张:SDGE 时代的性健康和生殖健康及权利

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
A. Yamin
A. Yamin
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Yamin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

选择性健康和生殖健康与权利的可持续发展目标、具体目标和指标,只有在越来越依赖指标来衡量进展的背景下,才能在努力推进这些权利的情况下加以理解。如果千年发展目标(MDG)将SRHR中固有的争议性问题非政治化,那么在可持续发展目标中(重新)产生关于权利的知识构成了一个更微妙但同样严重的威胁。尽管显然考虑到了权利,特别是SRHR,但这些指标表面上的中立掩盖了政治和意识形态。过度依赖数量指标可能会掩盖推进《战略和人力资源报告》所面临的结构性挑战,因此,指标应与根据具体情况得出的定性信息结合起来。
The selection of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) , targets and indicators for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) can only be understood in the light of struggles to advance these rights amid a context of the growing reliance on indicators to measure progress. If the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) de‐politicized inherently polemical issues in SRHR, the (re)production of knowledge of rights in the SDGs poses a subtler, but just as serious, threat. Although rights, and SRHR in particular, are apparently taken into account, the apparent neutrality of these metrics obscures politics and ideology. There is a danger that over‐reliance on quantitative indicators obscures the structural challenges facing the advancement of SRHR, and therefore indicators should be coupled with qualitative information derived in context.