What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach
What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach
复制标题
政策执行情况发生了什么？
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003544
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Linda Deleon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Deleon;Linda Deleon
政策分析家最早探讨的课题之一是公共政策的执行。从杰弗里·普雷斯曼（Jeffrey Pressman）和亚伦·维尔达夫斯基（Aaron Wildavsky）的开创性工作开始，政策实施在过去30年里从一个很大程度上被忽视的兴趣发展成为政策分析增长行业。然而，尽管有大量的书籍和文章涉及执行问题，但有些人认为，由于执行问题与一般化的政策执行理论之间的关系存在问题，因此执行问题会导致知识上的死胡同。在这篇文章中，我们考察了三代政策执行理论研究，强调其对命令的基本依赖（即，自上而下）的方向，我们认为，另一种框架，一个强调更民主的（即，自下而上）的方法，将是一个更富有成效的调查路线。
One of the earliest topics addressed by policy analysts was public policy implementation. Starting with the seminal work of Jeffrey Pressman and Aaron Wildavsky, policy implementation has burgeoned from a largely overlooked interest to perhaps the policy analysis growth industry over the last thirty years. However, even though an enormous set of books and articles deals with implementation, it has been described by some as leading to an intellectual dead end because of its problematic relationship to a generalized theory of policy implementation. In this article we examine three generations of policy implementation theory research, emphasizing its basic reliance on a command (i.e., top-down) orientation, and we argue that an alternative framework, one stressing a more democratic (i.e., bottom-up) approach, would be a more fruitful line of inquiry.