A structural comparison between state and trait self‐regulation models
A structural comparison between state and trait self‐regulation models
复制标题
状态自我调节模型和特质自我调节模型的结构比较
DOI：
10.1002/acp.2350090406
复制
发表时间：
1995
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
E. Hong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Hong
采用同步验证性因子分析对315名初中生的状态与特质调节模型进行了比较。发现每一个一阶、二阶和三阶因子模型都能很好地描述状态和特征测量的数据。在状态自我调节模型和特质自我调节模型中，第三级因子自我调节由元认知和努力组成，第二级因子元认知由意识、认知策略、计划和自我检查组成。状态和特质测量的不变因子负荷和因子相关性表明，状态和特质的自我调节因子结构相似。与情感人格领域的状态-特质差异不同，认知领域的状态-特质差异不明显。在这两项测试中，经常参加元认知活动和努力解决数学问题的学生比不经常参加的学生表现得更好。
State and trait-regulation models were compared in 315 eleventh-graders using simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis. Each of the first-, second-, and third-order factor models was found to describe the data from both state and trait measures well. In both state and trait self-regulation models, the third-order factor, self-regulation, is composed of metacognition and effort, and the second-order factor, metacognition, is composed of awareness, cognitive strategy, planning, and self-checking. Findings of invariant factor loadings and factor correlations across state and trait measures indicate that the state and trait self-regulatory factor structures are similar. Unlike the state-trait distinctions found in affective personality domain, clear state-trait distinction was not found in this cognitive domain. In both measures, students who engaged more frequently in metacognitive activities and effort use in their mathematical problem solving performed better than those who did not.
成人状态和特质焦虑的差异稳定性的证据。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Usala,PD;Hertzog,C
通讯作者：
Hertzog,C