Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note
Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2007.05.005
复制
发表时间：
2008-02-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Roese, Neal J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Summerville, Amy;Roese, Neal J.
监管焦点理论区分了两种独立的战略倾向结构：促进与预防。然而，该理论暗示了对这些倾向的两种潜在的独立定义，即自我引导和参考点定义。两个量表（监管焦点问卷）[Higgins， E. T., Friedman， R. S., Harlow， R. E., Idson, l.c., Ayduk， O. N., & Taylor， A.(2001)]。主观成功史的成就取向：晋升骄傲与预防骄傲。[j] .社会心理学研究，2007,(1):1 -2。积极和消极榜样的激励：监管焦点决定了谁能最好地激励我们。[j] .人格与社会心理学杂志，83,854-864])已被广泛用于测量性格调节焦点。我们认为这两个量表分别符合两个定义，并发现这两个量表在很大程度上是不相关的。讨论了概念和方法上的影响。(C) 2007爱思唯尔公司版权所有。
Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between two independent structures of strategic inclination, promotion versus prevention. However, the theory implies two potentially independent definitions of these inclinations, the self-guide versus the reference-point definitions. Two scales (the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire [Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23] and the General Regulatory Focus Measure [Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive and negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864]) have been widely used to measure dispositional regulatory focus. We suggest that these two scales align respectively with the two definitions, and find that the two scales are largely uncorrelated. Both conceptual and methodological implications are discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.