A comparative study of typical early celadon shards from Eastern Zhou and Eastern Han dynasty (China)
A comparative study of typical early celadon shards from Eastern Zhou and Eastern Han dynasty (China)
复制标题
东周和东汉时期典型早期青瓷碎片的比较研究（中国）
DOI：
10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102530
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Xiangqian Feng
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lingtong Yan;Miao Liu;Heyang Sun;Li Li;Xiangqian Feng
中国许多学者认为青瓷的发展可分为原始和成熟两个阶段。这两种类型的器皿被认为在产品质量上有显著差异。近年来，由于东周时期（公元前770-前221年）出土了大量高质量的青瓷原片，人们对青瓷的分类产生了很大的争议。本文收集了这些典型的原始青瓷碎片和东汉早期的成熟青瓷，并从坯、釉、烧成三个方面对它们进行了比较。根据分析结果，我们认为这两种瓷片都是以瓷石为原料，施富石灰釉。它们大多具有较高的烧成温度（1000 °C以上），且烧成体的矿物学转变完全。两者的差异主要表现在釉的外观和厚度的均匀性、坯体所含矿物（特别是方石英）的含量以及烧成工艺的控制等方面。这些结论对进一步讨论青瓷的分类问题有一定的参考价值。
Many Chinese scholars thought that the development of celadon could be divided into two stages, proto and mature. The two types of wares were considered to have significant differences in product quality. In recent years, people have many controversies about the celadon classification, because many proto shards with high quality from Eastern Zhou dynasty (770–221 BCE) were unearthed. In this paper, we collected these typical proto celadon shards and some early mature wares from Eastern Han Dynasty (24–220 CE), and compared them in terms of body, glaze and firing. Based on analysis results, we believe that both types of potshards used porcelain-stone as the raw material and were applied lime-rich glaze. Most of them have relatively high firing temperature (above 1000 °C) and completed mineralogical transformation in their fired bodies. The differences between them are mainly glazes’ appearance and thickness uniformity, content of minerals (especially cristobalite) contained in the bodies and control of firing process. These conclusions should be useful for the further discussion about the celadon classification.