Women's Rights and Society's Needs: Japan's 1931 Suffrage Bill
Women's Rights and Society's Needs: Japan's 1931 Suffrage Bill
复制标题
妇女权利和社会需求：日本 1931 年选举权法案
DOI：
10.1017/s0010417500014171
复制
发表时间：
1986
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
S. H. Nolte
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. H. Nolte
女性的历史与男性不同。妇女的历史突出了性别的文化建构，即“男人”和“女人”的定义方式，在很大程度上独立于生理上的男性和女性。文化构建的性别体系与社会政治体系相互作用的方式刚刚开始被探索。1同时，学者们还发现他们对民族国家的定义也在不断变化。查尔斯·布莱特（Charles Bright）和苏珊·哈丁（Susan Harding）批评了韦伯主义和马克思主义的国家分析传统，一方面强调国家结构和倡议与另一方面社会运动之间开放式、连续性和偶然性的相互作用。2现在是从跨文化角度重新考虑妇女与国家之间关系的好时机。在这里，我将在政治背景下审视日本的妇女选举权运动（1919-31），以鼓励与其他妇女选举权运动进行比较，并从研究最少的挑战者之一的角度重新审视两次世界大战期间的日本国家。
The history of women is different from that of men. Women's history is the highlighting of the cultural construction of gender, the ways in which “men” and “women” are defined in considerable autonomy from biological males and females. The culturally constructed gender system interacts with a society's political system in ways that are just beginning to be explored.1 At the same time, scholars also find their definitions of national states to be in flux. Criticizing both Weberian and Marxist traditions of analysis of the state, Charles Bright and Susan Harding have stressed the open-ended, continuous, and contingent interplay between state structures and initiatives on the one hand, and social movements on the other.2 It is an auspicious time to reconsider the relationships between women and the state in cross-cultural perspective. Here I will examine the women's suffrage movement in Japan (1919–31 ) in its political context in order to encourage comparison with other women's suffrage movements, and to re-examine the interwar Japanese state from the viewpoint of one of its least-studied challengers.