Evolving Urban Culture in Transforming Cities The role of the configuration of the network of public spaces in urban life
Evolving Urban Culture in Transforming Cities The role of the configuration of the network of public spaces in urban life
复制标题
城市转型中不断发展的城市文化公共空间网络配置在城市生活中的作用
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Azimzadeh
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hans Bjur;M. Azimzadeh
The concepts of housing estate and street system characterize two planning strategies involved in the formation and transformation of cities during the last century. This paper presents a comparative study which aims to explore the functional, social and cultural contents of the spatial configurations generated in cities through adoption of these concepts in planning. The Swedish city of Gothenburg is compared to the cities of Yazd and Abadan in Iran. The method of Space Syntax is applied in the analysis of the spatial systems of the studied cities. The functional and structural position of the historic core in the cities of Gothenburg and Yazd reflects the original characteristics of these cities and their different courses of transformation. The urban structure in the old city of Gothenburg was based on a well integrated street network. The traditional city of Yazd, on the contrary, had a deep segregated spatial structure. In Gothenburg, in contrast to the city of Yazd, the historic core is now a well functioning city centre, a real public space. However, adopting two different planning models in the long course of urban development, Gothenburg has gained many of the global structural properties of Iranian traditional cities and Yazd has become more akin to the traditional city of Gothenburg. In Abadan segregated self-contained housing estates determined the original structure of the city. Abadan is the first company town in Iran built almost a century ago. It was a product of the latest experimentation of advanced industrial capitalism of the day in social engineering. Nevertheless Abadan became a prominent example of emancipation from rigid modern paternalist urbanism. The later process of urban development in Abadan was managed by two parallel organizations, the Company and the Municipality. The result, however, was not a parallel but an integrating city. The control over the public space was strongly contested, leading to the appearance of a new human and democratic urban culture, a flourishing urban life with its street based spatial organisation. The analysis of urban structure in Abadan and Gothenburg displays interesting similarities though the processes of development of the two cities have been the reverse of each other.