Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change
Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change
复制标题
超越国家/非国家分歧：全球城市与气候变化治理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Heike Schroeder
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Bulkeley;Heike Schroeder
本文挑战了这样一种假设，即国家与非国家、公共与私人的界限可以轻易划定。它认为，行为者的角色——国家或非国家——以及权力形式——公共或私人——不是预先给定的，而是通过治理过程形成的。它借鉴了新葛兰西学派和治理学的观点，认为对国家进行更动态的描述，可以提供一种更细致入微的方法来分析治理全球环境事务的过程。为了理解这一过程和治理气候变化的结果，我们认为，分析应该集中在霸权项目和计划上，通过这些项目和计划，治理的对象和主体得以构成和竞争，并通过这些项目和计划，国家和权威的形式和性质得以实现。我们认为，这是一个通过在不同的社会和物质实体之间“锻造一致性”来实现和保持的过程，以实现“正确的事物配置”，从而实现治理气候变化的意愿（Murray Li, 2007a）。我们通过研究伦敦和洛杉矶这两个全球城市对气候变化的治理来说明这一论点。
This article challenges the assumption that the boundaries of state versus non-state and public versus private can readily be drawn. It argues that the roles of actors — as state or non-state — and the forms of authority — public or private — are not pre-given but are forged through the process of governing. Drawing on neo-Gramscian and governmentality perspectives, it suggests that a more dynamic account of the state can offer a more nuanced means of analysing the process of governing global environmental affairs. In order to understand this process and the outcomes of governing climate change, we argue that analysis should focus on the hegemonic projects and programmes through which the objects and subjects of governing are constituted and contested, and through which the form and nature of the state and authority are accomplished. We suggest that this is a process achieved and held in place through ‘forging alignment’ between diverse social and material entities in order to achieve the ‘right disposition of things’ through which the will to govern climate change can be realized (Murray Li, 2007a). We illustrate this argument by examining the governing of climate change in two global cities, London and Los Angeles.