Reconstructing Causal Reasoning about Evidence: a Case Study
Reconstructing Causal Reasoning about Evidence: a Case Study
复制标题
重建证据的因果推理：案例研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Renooij
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Prakken;S. Renooij
当程序支持系统要在实践中发挥作用时，它们应该为关于证据的因果推理提供支持。这种支持既应是合理的，也应是对这类系统的用户而言自然的。本文研究了这种支持的两个可能的基础，即可废止论证的逻辑和因果-溯因推理的逻辑模型。在这两种形式主义中重构了一起车祸的法院判决，并从比例和自然性两个方面对结果进行了比较。结论是，需要更多的研究来结合这两种方法的优点。
When procedural-support systems are to be useful in practice, they should provide support for causal reasoning about evidence. Such support should be both ra- tionally well-founded and natural to the users of such systems. This article studies two possible foundations for such support, logics for defeasible argumentation and logical models of causal-abductive reasoning. A court decision about a car accident is reconstructed in the two formalisms, and the results are compared on both their ratio- nality and their naturalness. It is concluded that more research is needed to combine the strong points of the two approaches.